Sociotechnical Systems View of Catalysts that Enable Underrepresented Minority Student Success

Abstract

Academic institutions in the US have recently refocused their attention on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. This panel consisting of engineering faculty, administrators and industry professionals will discuss how colleges of engineering can approach the problem of recruiting, retaining, and graduating undergraduate underrepresented minority (URM) students by using a sociotechnical systems modeling approach. The main thrust of the discussion is how an academic organizational system such as a college of engineering can be broken down into a social system consisting of the people (students, faculty, staff and other stakeholders), and a technical system consisting of programs and initiatives for URM student success. Joint analyses of the social system and the technical system can then reveal systemwide barriers and opportunities for enabling URM student success.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aken

J. E. van

. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field- tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246.

Ansoff

H. I.

(1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 131–148.

Burke

W. W.

Litwin

G. H.

(1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523–545.

Butcher

Clarke

(2003). Redefining managerial work: Smart politics. Management Decision.

Cross

(2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Cummings

T. G.

Worley

C. G.

(2014). Organization development and change. Cengage learning.

Dunbar

R. L.

Starbuck

W. H.

(2006). Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organization Science, 17(2), 171–178.

Hammer

Champy

(1993). Reengineering in corporation. A manifesto for business revolution. HarperBusiness, a division of HarperCollins publisher.

Harris

Raviv

(2002). Organization design. Management Science, 48(7), 852–865.

10.

Hickson

D. J.

Hinings

C. R.

Lee

C. A.

Schneck

R. E.

Pennings

J. M.

(1971). A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 216–229.

11.

Král

Králová

(2016). Approaches to changing organizational structure: The effect of drivers and communication. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5169–5174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.099

12.

Mintzberg

(1979). The structuring of organizations. Engle- wood Cliffs. J: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Mintzberg

(1983). Power in and around organizations. Prentice Hall.

14.

Nadler

D. A.

Tushman

(1980). Frameworks for organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51.

15.

Pfeffer

(1978). Organizational design.

16.

Robert

Peters

T. J.

Phillips

J. R.

(1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14–26.

17.

Romme

A. G. L.

(2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573.

18.

Schön

(1983). The reflective practitioner basic books. New York.

19.

Simon

H. A.

(1969). The sciences of the artificial MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.

20.

Taylor

J. C.

Felten

D. F.

(1993). Performance by design: Sociotechnical systems in north america. Prentice Hall.