This panel will provide a transdisciplinary perspective on developing artificial social intelligence for teams. A panel with representatives from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences will discuss theoretical, methodological, and technological insights derived from their respective disciplines. These perspectives will be integrated via a set of questions meant to guide synthesis across disciplines in support of a transdisciplinary team research approach. Through discussion across the panel and audience, our goal is to contribute to research and development in the area of Human-AI-Robot Teaming effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrackenB. K.AlexanderV.ZakP. J.RomeroV.BarrazaJ. A. (2014). Physiological synchronization is associated with narrative emotionality and subsequent behavioral response. International Conference on Augmented Cognition, 3–13.
2.
ChikersalP.TomprouM.KimY. J.WoolleyA. W.DabbishL. (2017). Deep structures of collaboration: Physiological correlates of collective intelligence and group satisfaction. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 873–888.
3.
CookeN. J.GormanJ. C.MyersC. W.DuranJ. L. (2013). Interactive Team Cognition. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12009
4.
DemirM.LikensA. D.CookeN. J.AmazeenP. G.McNeeseN. J. (2019). Team Coordination and Effectiveness in Human-Autonomy Teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2877482
5.
DemirMustafaCookeN. J.AmazeenP. G. (2018). A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.cogsys.2018.07.029
6.
Elkin-FrankstonS.BrackenB. K.IrvinS.JenkinsM. (2017). Are Behavioral Measures Useful for Detecting Cognitive Workload During Human-Computer Interaction? In AhramT. Z.KarwowskiW. (Eds.), Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering (Vol. 494, pp. 127137). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41947-313
7.
FioreS. M.KapaloK. A. (2017). Innovation in team interaction: New methods for assessing collaboration between brains and bodies using a multi-level framework. In Innovative assessment of collaboration (pp. 51–64). Springer.
8.
GuastelloS. J. (2010). Nonlinear Dynamics of Team Performance and Adaptability in Emergency Response. Human Factors, 52(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809359003
9.
HadornG. H.PohlC.BammerG. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinary, 431–452.
10.
HakenH. (1978). Synergetics: An introduction : nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry, and biology (Enlarged 2nd edition). Springer-Verlag.
11.
HassonU.FurmanO.ClarkD.DudaiY.DavachiL. (2008). Enhanced intersubject correlations during movie viewing correlate with successful episodic encoding. Neuron, 57(3), 452–462.
12.
KleinJ. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515–526.
13.
KleinJ. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S116–S123.
14.
National Academy of Sciences. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press.
15.
PhillipsE.OsoskyS.GroveJ.JentschF. (2011). From tools to teammates: Toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1491–1495.
16.
StokolsD. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1-2), 79–93.
17.
StokolsD.HallK. L.TaylorB. K.MoserR. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S77–S89.
18.
VidulichM. A.StrattonM.CrabtreeM.WilsonG. (1994). Performance-based and physiological measures of situational awareness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.
19.
WagnerA.BriscoeE. (2017). Psychological modeling of humans by assistive robots. In Human Modelling for Bio-Inspired Robotics (pp. 273296). Elsevier.
20.
WagnerC. S.RoessnerJ. D.BobbK.KleinJ. T.BoyackK. W.KeytonJ.RafolsI.BonierK. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26.
21.
WartaS. F.KapaloK. A.BestA.FioreS. M. (2016). Similarity, complementarity, and agency in HRI: Theoretical issues in shifting the perception of robots from tools to teammates. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 1230–1234.
22.
WilsonG. F. (2000). Strategies for psychophysiological assessment of situation awareness. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, 175–188.
23.
XuJ.SlagleJ. M.BanerjeeA.BrackenB.WeingerM. B. (2019). Use of a Portable Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) System to Examine Team Experience During Crisis Event Management in Clinical Simulations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 85.
24.
YunK.WatanabeK.ShimojoS. (2012). Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction. Scientific Reports, 2, 959.
