Virtual reality (VR) is a simulation tool that is being used extensively to study the effects of training and perception. However, several studies have shown that some aspects of perception within VR are not always accurate. The present study investigates the perception of time within a VR environment by asking for retrospective time judgments of the length of VR experiences. These environments varied in both the level of interaction with the VR environment, and also the spatial properties of the environment itself. The judged length of time did not significantly differ between conditions based on the level of activity in the environment. However, the spatial properties of the VR environment did produce significantly different time estimations. This finding suggests that careful attention should be paid to what and how users are trained or evaluated in VR.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerR.Benbunan-FichR. (2014). The effects of task difficulty and multitasking on performance. Interacting with Computers, 27(4), 430–439. DOI:10.1093/iwc/iwu005.
2.
ArmbrüsterC.WolterM.KuhlenT.SpijkersW.FimmB. (2008). Depth perception in virtual reality: distance estimations in peri-and extrapersonal space. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 9–15.
3.
BaldaufD.BurgardE.WittmannM. (2009). Time perception as a workload measure in simulated car driving. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 929–935. DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.004
4.
BecharaA.DamasioH.TranelD.DamasioA. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295. DOI:10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
5.
BhagatK.LiouW.ChangC. (2016). A cost-effective interactive 3D virtual reality system applied to military live firing training. Virtual Reality. 20, 127–140. DOI 10.1007/s10055-016-0284-x.
BlockR.HancockP.ZakayD. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica. 134. 330–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006
8.
BotvinickM.RosenZ. (2008). Anticipation of cognitive demand during decision making. Psychological Research, 73, 835–842. DOI 10.1007/s00426-008-0197-8.
9.
BroadwayJ.EngleR. (2011). Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reduction. Acta Psychologica. 137. 115–126. DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.008.
10.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of flow in work and games. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.
12.
EaglemanD.TseP.BuonomanoD.JanssenP.NobreA.HolcombeA. (2005). Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time. The Journal of Neuroscience. 25(45), 10369–10371. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3487-05.2005
13.
El JamiyF.MarshR. (2019). Survey on depth perception in head mounted displays: distance estimation in virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. IET Image Processing, 13(5), 707–712.
14.
FiligenziM.OrrT.RuffT. (2000). Virtual reality for mine safety training. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 15(6), 465–469.
15.
FinneganD.O’NeillE.ProulxM. (2016). Compensating for Distance Compression in Audiovisual Virtual Environments Using Incongruence. In CHI ‘16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 200212). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858065
16.
FrenchJ.W.EkstromR.B.PriceL.A. (1963). Hidden Figures Test: Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
17.
KhanA.SharmaN.DixitS. (2006). Effect of cognitive load and paradigm on time perception. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 32(1), 37–42.
18.
KidaN.OdaS.MatsumuraM. (2005). Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time, Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 257–264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.003.
19.
LacquanitiF.CarrozzoM.d’AvellaA.La ScaleiaB.MoscatelliA.ZagoM. (2014). How long did it last? You better ask a human. Frontiers in Neurobiotics. 8, article 2, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2014.00002
20.
LiX.YuanD.FanY.YanC.GaoL. (2019). Effect of motion perception on intertemporal choice is associated with the altered perception of time. Psychological Reports. 122(1), 117–134. DOI: 10.1177/0033294118755098
21.
LinJ.DuhH.ParkerD.Abi-RachedH.FurnessT. (2002). Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, Orlando, FL, USA. 164–171. DOI: 10.1109/VR.2002.996519.
22.
LoomisJ.KnappJ. (2003). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In HettingerL. J.HaasM. W. (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments: Applications, implications, and human performance issues (p. 21–46). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410608888.pt1
23.
MatthewsW.J. (2011). How do changes in speed affect the perception of duration?Journal of Experimental Psychology 37(5), 1617–1627. DOI: 10.1037/a0022193
24.
MatthewsW.J.MeckW.H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 865–907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045
25.
MellaN.ContyL.PouthasV. (2010). The role of physiological arousal in time perception: Psychophysical evidence from an emotion regulation paradigm. Brain and Cognition. 75, 182–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11.012
26.
PlumertJ.KearneyJ.CremerJ.ReckerK. (2005). Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. 2(3), 216–233. DOI: 10.1145/1077399.1077402
27.
SackettA.MeyvisT.NelsonL.ConverseB.SackettA. (2010). You’re having fun when time flies: the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychological Science, 21(1), 111–117. DOI: 10.1177/0956797609354832.
SeymourN.GallagherA.RomanS.O’BrianM.BansalV.AndersenD.SatavaR. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized double blind study. Annals of Surgery. 236(4), 458–464. DOI: 10.1097/00000658200210000-00008
30.
SucalaM.StefanS.Szentagotai-TatarA.DavidD. (2010). Time flies when you expect to have fun. An experimental investigation of the relationship between expectancies and the perception of time progression. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. 14 (3), 231–241. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.20391.80805
31.
UnsworthN.RedickT.S.HeitzR.P.BroadwayJ.M.EngleR.W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210902998047.
32.
van der HamI.KlaassenF.van SchieK.CuperusA. (2019). Elapsed time estimates in virtual reality and the physical world: the role of arousal and emotional valence. Computers in Human Behavior. 94, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.005.
33.
van WassenhoveV.BuonomanoD.ShimojoS.ShamnL. (2008). Distortions of subjective time perception within and across senses. PLoS ONE, 3(1), e1437. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001437.
34.
WittmannM.PaulusM. (2008). Decision making, impulsivity and time perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 7–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004.
35.
ZakayD.BlockR. (2004). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: and executive-control perspective. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentals. 64, 319–328.
36.
ZhaoM.Sinnis-BourozikasA.InterranteV. (2019). Exploring the Use of Immersive Virtual Reality to Assess the Impact of Outdoor Views on the Perceived Size and Spaciousness of Architectural Interiors. In: BourdotP.InterranteV.NedelL.Magnenat-ThalmannN.ZachmannG. (eds) Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. EuroVR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11883. Springer, Cham.
