A Remote Synthetic Testbed For Human-Robot Teaming: An Iterative Design Process

Abstract

Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) missions often involve a need to complete tasks in hazardous environments. In such situations, human-robot teams (HRT) may be essential tools for future USAR missions. Transparency and explanation are two information exchange processes where transparency is real-time information exchange and explanation is not. For effective HRTs, certain levels of transparency and explanation must be met, but how can these modes of team communication be operationalized? During the COVID-19 pandemic, our approach to answering this question involved an iterative design process that factored in our research objectives as inputs and pilot studies with remote participants. Our final research testbed design resulted in converting an in-person task environment to a completely remote study and task environment. Changes to the study environment included: utilizing user-friendly video conferencing tools such as Zoom and a custom-built application for research administration tasks and improved modes of HRT communication that helped us avoid confounding our performance measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cannon-Bowers

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Salas

Volpe

C. E.

(1995). Defining team competencies: Implications for training requirements and strategies—Google Scholar. In Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 333–380). http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Defining+team+competencies%3A+Implications+for+training+requirements+and+strategies&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C3

Cooke

N. J.

Demir

Huang

(2020). A Framework For Human-Autonomy Teaming Research. 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Game, Work, and Play Together From Anywhere | Parsec . (n.d.). Parsec Gaming. Retrieved March 19, 2021, from https://parsec.app

Gonzalez

Vanyukov

Martin

M. K.

(2005). The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.014

Gould

J. D.

Lewis

(1983). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/800045.801579

Kelly

J. F.

(1984) An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/357417.357420

Lematta

G. J.

Coleman

P. B.

Bhatti

S. A.

Chiou

E. K.

McNeese

N. J.

Demir

Cooke

N. J.

(2019). Developing Human-Robot Team Interdependence in a Synthetic Task Environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 1503–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631433

Murphy

R. R.

Tadokoro

Nardi

Jacoff

Fiorini

Choset

Erkmen

A. M.

(2008). Search and Rescue Robotics. In Siciliano

Khatib

(Eds.), Springer Handbook of Robotics (pp. 1151– 1173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_51

Zoom Chat . (n.d.). Zoom. Retrieved March 19, 2021, from https://zoom.us/