Effect of Driver Distraction on Vehicle Speed Control

Abstract

Performing a secondary task while driving impairs various performance measures, including speed control. Distraction is associated with reductions in driving speed; however, this is often based on global measures of performance, such as course completion time or mean speed. This study investigated how a secondary task affected granular speed variation. Participants (N=16, ages 18-43) performed a secondary task of mentally subtracting pairs of numbers while negotiating a simulated road course. Various driving performance measures were obtained but only results for longitudinal velocity are reported. The results reveal that drivers exhibited significant increases and decreases (>2+/- SD) in vehicle speed under distraction, with participants showing a stronger tendency to decrease their speed (60% of the observed speed violations). This may explain why global measures of driving speed under distraction reveal a slowing down. These results may increase our understanding of the nuanced effects of distraction on driving and be useful for predicting/diagnosing distracted driving behavior.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. (2019). 2019 Traffic safety culture index. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

Choudhary

Velaga

(2017). Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 370–378.

Choudhary

Velaga

(2019). Effects of phone use on driving performance: A comparative analysis of young and professional drivers. Safety Science, 111, 179–187.

Donohue

S. E.

James

Eslick

A. N.

Mitroff

S. R.

(2012). Cognitive pitfall! Videogame players are not immune to dual-task costs. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 803–809.

Evans

(2004). Traffic Safety. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Science Serving Society.

Fitch

G. M.

Grove

Hanowski

R. J.

Perez

M. A

. (2014). Compensatory behavior of drivers when conversing on a cell phone: Investigation with naturalistic driving data. Transportation Research Record, 2434(1), 1–8.

Haigney

D.E.

Taylor

R.G.

Westerman

S.J.

(2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transportation Research Part F, 3, 113–121.

McGinty

J. C.

(2015, November). With yellow lights, timing is everything. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/with-yellow-lightstiming-is-everything1446212730#:~:text=But%20traffic%20engineers%20in%20the,between%203%20and%206%20seconds

National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020). Distracted driving 2018 (Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 926). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

10.

Ortiz-Peregrina

Oviedo-Trespalacios

Ortiz

Casares-López

Salas

Anera

R. G.

(2020). Factors determining speed management during distracted driving (WhatsApp messaging). Scientific Reports, 10.

11.

Oviedo-Trespalacios

Haque

King

Washington

(2017a). Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 101, 67–77.

12.

Oviedo-Trespalacios

Haque

King

Washington

(2017b). Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory. Traffic Injury Prevention, 18(6), 599–605.

13.

Papantoniou

Papadimitriou

Yannis

(2017). Review of driving performance parameters critical for distracted driving research. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 1796–1805.

14.

Parnell

K. J.

Rand

Plant

K. L.

(2020). A diary study of distracted driving behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 1–14.

15.

Rakauskas

M. E.

Gugerty

L. J.

Ward

N. J.

(2004). Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 35(4), 453–464.