As autonomous vehicles (AVs) become more prevalent on the roadways, accompanying driving technologies are being developed. V2I communication systems are one such development, allowing the dissemination of crucial information to drivers. As more AVs are introduced on the road, understanding driver perception of AVs is crucial not only for user acceptance, but non-user acceptance as well. The use of V2I systems may be helpful in bridging the gap between users and non-users by making all drivers more informed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiassoniF.BalzarottiS.GiamporcaroM.CiceriR. (2016). Hot or Cold Anger? Verbal and Vocal Expression of Anger While Driving in a Simulated Anger-Provoking Scenario. SAGE Open, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016658084
2.
BobanM.d’OreyP. M. (2016). Exploring the Practical Limits of Cooperative Awareness in Vehicular Communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicle Technology, 65(6), 3904–3916.
3.
BreuJ.BrakemeierA.MenthM. (2013). Analysis of Cooperative Awareness Message Rates in VANETs. IEEE 13th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications, 6.
4.
CottamB. J. (2018). Transportation Planning for Connected Autonomous Vehicles: How It All Fits Together. Transportation Research Record, 2672(51), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756632
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763
RottenbergJ.RayR. D.GrossJ. J. (2007). Emotion Elicitation Using Films. In Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 9–28). Oxford University Press.
9.
SichitiuM.KihlM. (2008). Inter-Vehicle Communication Systems: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 88–105.
10.
SiedleckaE.DensonT. F. (2019). Experimental Methods for Inducing Basic Emotions: A Qualitative Review. Emotion Review, 11(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917749016
11.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.4.813
12.
StephensA. N.TrawleyS. L.MadiganR.GroegerJ. A. (2013). Drivers Display Anger-Congruent Attention to Potential Traffic Hazards: Anger and visual attention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2894
13.
ThandavarayanG.SepulcreM.GozalvezJ. (2020). Analysis of Message Generation Rules for Collective Perception in Connected and Automated Driving.
14.
UnderwoodG.ChapmanP.WrightS.CrundallD. (1999). Anger while driving. Transportation Research Part F, 55–68.
15.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
16.
WuH.LeeJ.HunterM.FujimotoR.GuenslerR. L.KoJ. (2005). Efficiency of Simulated Vehicle-to-Vehicle Message Propagation in Atlanta, Georgia, I75 Corridor. Transportation Research Record, 1910, 82–89.
17.
ZhangT.ChanA.BaY.ZhangW. (2016). Situational driving anger, driving performance and allocation of visual attention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.008
