Operating room throughput variability with spinal procedures revealed task inefficiency and potential safety concerns. Using the DMAIC framework (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), a transdisciplinary team conducted a quality improvement (QI) research project to identify and address safety concerns with prone patient positioning. The main problem with patient positioning was undefined standard practice. Clinicians reported prone patient positioning for spinal surgery patients is physically demanding. Thus, the team conducted a rapid upper limb assessment for injury risk during patient positioning and identified a greater risk of clinician injury in the manual transfer process. The QI research team recommended the mechanical process of rotating patients with the Jackson Table to improve workload for the Surgical Team and developed training and design enhancements to support this workflow. The DMAIC quality framework enabled clinician collaboration with researchers to develop interventions to support a standardized process during prone patient positioning with the Jackson Table.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsieduG. B.LowndesB. R.HuddlestonP. M.HallbeckS. (2018). “The Jackson Table Is a Pain in the…”: a qualitative study of providers’ perception toward a spinal surgery table. Journal of patient safety, 14(1), 21–26.
2.
BeardenB. G.ConradB. P.HorodyskiM.RechtineG. R. (2007). Motion in the unstable cervical spine: comparison of manual turning and use of the Jackson table in prone positioning. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 7(2), 161–164.
3.
DiPaolaM. J.DiPaolaC. P.ConradB. P.HorodyskiM.Del RossiG.SawersA.. . . RechtineG. R. (2008). Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model. Clinical Spine Surgery, 21(4), 273–280.
4.
HignettS.JonesE. L.MillerD.WolfL.ModiC.ShahzadM. W.. . . CatchpoleK. (2015). Human factors and ergonomics and quality improvement science: integrating approaches for safety in healthcare. BMJ quality & safety, 24(4), 250–254.
5.
Kopach-KonradR.LawleyM.CriswellM.HasanI.ChakrabortyS.PeknyJ.DoebbelingB. N. (2007). Applying systems engineering principles in improving health care delivery. Journal of general internal medicine, 22(3), 431–437.
6.
KraftS. J.LowndesB. R.HallbeckM. S. (2020). Defining Best Practices for Patient Safety in Positioning and Transferring Patients With the Surgical Spine Table. Orthopaedic Nursing, 39(1), 7–20.
7.
McAtamneyL.CorlettE. N. (1993). RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied ergonomics, 24(2), 91–99.
8.
MoldJ. W.PetersonK. A. (2005). Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(suppl 1), S12-S20.
9.
MorrisP. E.DracupK. (2007). Quality improvement or research? The ethics of hospital project oversight. American Journal of Critical Care, 16(5), 424–426.
