Applying Cognitive Load Theory to Examine STEM Undergraduate Students’ Experiences in An Adaptive Learning Environment: A Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract

This study examined undergraduate STEM students’ experiences using an online introductory computer programming learning environment equipped with an automated hint generation system. Following a convergent parallel mixed methods design, this study utilized both quantitative and qualitative data from student experiential data. Analysis by level of prior knowledge demonstrated that elements of the learning environment did not cater to their learning needs and cognitive architecture. Cognitive Load Theory was used to contextualize system elements against both higher and lower prior experience learners, ultimately pointing to a need to design better scaffolds and hints to the needs of novice CS learners.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fraser

2013. Blockly. Google.

Fyfe

E. R.

Rittle-Johnson

. (2016). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 82–97.

George

Mallery

(2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10 ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson

Kalyuga

(2007). Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive E learning environments: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 387–399.

Kirschner

P. A.

(2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1),1–10.

Kurasaki

K. S.

(2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods, 12(3), 179–194.

Rachmatullah

Akram

Boulden

Mott

Boyer

Lester

Wiebe

(2020). Development and Validation of the Middle Grades Computer Science Concept Inventory (MG-CSCI) Assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(5), em1841.

10.

Rumelhart

D. E.

(2017). Schemata: The building blocks. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education, 11(1), 33–58.

11.

Stachel

Marghitu

Brahim

T. B.

Sims

Reynolds

Czelusniak

(2013). Managing cognitive load in introductory programming courses: A cognitive aware scaffolding tool. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, 17(1), 37–54.

12.

Strauss

Corbin

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

13.

Sweller

(2011). Chapter two - cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76.

14.

Wiebe

E. N.

Lamb

Hardy

Sharek

(2014). Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 123–132.

15.

Windell

Wiebe

Converse-Lane

Beith

(2006). A Comparison of Two Mental Workload Instruments in Multimedia Instruction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(17), 1764–1766.