User Experience (UX) extends the construct of usability by an additional focus on emotion, motivation and aesthetics. An emphasis on aesthetics has been undertaken to a greater extent by design disciplines than by science. The present review examines both design and scientific approaches to aesthetics in order to integrate the two approaches and identify research opportunities that could result in science based design principals. The review of design approaches to aesthetics indicates the primary importance of balance as an element of design. Accordingly, research on the role of balance in producing aesthetic responses from users is a reasonable starting point for a program of research. Additionally, the analysis of aesthetic metrics and individual differences in aesthetic preferences in scientific research are discussed as possible collaboration areas for designers.
AlharoonD.GillanD. J. (2020). The relation of the perceptions of aesthetics and usability. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 64th Annual Meeting, 64, 1876–1880. Chicago, IL: HFES.
3.
BiL.FanX.LiuY. (2011). Effects of symmetry and number of compositional elements on Chinese users’ aesthetic ratings of interfaces: Experimental and modeling investigations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27, 245–259.
4.
BradyL.PhillipsC. (2003). Aesthetics and usability: A look at color and balance. Usability News, 5(1), 1–4.
FaiolaA.HoC. C.TarrantM. D.MacDormanK. F. (2011). The aesthetic dimensions of US and South Korean responses to web home pages: A cross-cultural comparison. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(2), 131–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.537173
7.
GillanD. J.BiasR. G. (2003). Usability science. I: Foundations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 351–372.
8.
GillanD. J.BiasR. G. (2014). Usability science: II. Measurement. In CoovertM. D.ThompsonL. F. (Eds), The psychology of workplace technology, 162–182. New York: Routledge/Psychology Press.
9.
GrishinJ.GillanD. J. (2019). Exploring the boundary conditions of the effect of aesthetics on perceived usability. Journal of Usability Studies, 14, 76–104.
KarvonenK.CardholmL.KarlssonS. (2001). Cultures of trust: A cross-cultural study on the formation of trust in an electronic environment. Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Workshop on Secure IT Systems, (pp. 89–100). Reykjavik, Iceland: Tartu University Press.
13.
KoyamaY.IgarashiT. (2018). Computational design with crowds. In OulasvirtaAnttiKristenssonPer OlaBiXiaojunHowesAndrew (Eds.), Computational Interaction, chapter 6, 153–184. Oxford University Press.
14.
KurosuM.KashimuraK. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 292–293). New York: ACM
15.
LiY.YehY. (2010). Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 673–683.
ReineckeK.YehT.MiratrixL.MardikoR.ZhaoY.LiuJ.GajosK.Z. (2013). Predicting users’ first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In CHI ‘13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2049–2058). New York, NY: ACM Press.
20.
RobinsD.HolmesJ. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386–399.
21.
SecklerM.OpwisK.TuchA. N. (2015). Linking objective design factors with subjective aesthetics: An experimental study on how structure and color of websites affect the facets of users’ visual aesthetic perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 375–389.
22.
SondereggerA.SauerJ. (2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics, 41, 403–410.
23.
TractinskyN.KatzA. S.IkarD. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127145.
24.
TuchA. N.Bargas-AvilaJ. A.OpwisK. (2010). Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: It’s a man’s business. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 18311837. https://doi.org/10.1016ZJ.chb.2010.07.016
25.
TuchA. N.PresslaberE.StoecklinM.OpwisK.Bargas-AvilaJ. (2012). The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 794–811.
26.
ZhengX.ChakrabortyI.LinJ.RauschenbergerR. (2009). Correlating low-level image statistics with users’ rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages. In CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI
27.
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM Press.
