Prior research into using social networking sites (SNSs) by visually impaired (VI) users has focused primarily on their competencies and accessibility barriers in its usage. We argue, however, that there exists insufficient research into the daily pattern of use of SNSs by VI users and benefits unique to this population. To address these limitations, we conducted two empirical studies, a diary study and a follow-up in-depth interview study, to further explore the social experiences of VI users’ everyday Facebook engagement. Our findings show that VI users were motivated to use Facebook by the prospect of connecting with family and friends and that Facebook offers unique benefits to VI users in terms of improved quality-of-life through social capital building, knowledge obtainment, and entertainment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaekY. M.BaeY.JangH. (2013, May). Social and Parasocial Relationships on Social Network Sites and Their Differential Relationships with Users’ Psychological Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(7), 512–517. Retrieved 2020-0523, from https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cyber.2012.0510 (Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers) doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0510
2.
BennettC. L., E, J.MottM. E.CutrellE.MorrisM. R. (2018, April). How Teens with Visual Impairments Take, Edit, and Share Photos on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). Montreal QC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved 2020-04-30, from http://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173650 doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173650
3.
BradyE. L.ZhongY.MorrisM. R.BighamJ. P. (2013). Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work -CSCW ‘13 (p. 1225). San Antonio, Texas, USA: ACM Press. Retrieved 2020-02-22, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2441776.2441915 doi: 10.1145/ 2441776.2441915
4.
BrinkleyJ.HoffmanD.TabriziN. (2017). A social networking site portable profile system for blind and visually impaired users based on cloud and semantic web technologies. In 2017 ieee international conference on cognitive computing (iccc) (pp. 104–111).
5.
BrinkleyJ.TabriziN. (2013). A pilot study examining the online behavior of web users with visual impairments. Editorial Preface, 4(11).
6.
BrinkleyJ.TabriziN. (2017, September). A Desktop Usability Evaluation of the Facebook Mobile Interface using the JAWS Screen Reader with Blind Users. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 828–832. Retrieved 2020-05-20, from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1541931213601699 doi: 10.1177/1541931213601699
7.
BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010, April). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1909–1912). Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved 2020-05-02, from http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753613 doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753613
8.
CadmanD.BoyleM.SzatmariP.OffordD. R. (1986). Chronic Illness, Disability, and Mental and Social Well-Being: Findings of the Ontario Child Health Study., 11.
9.
CainJ.PolicastriA. (2011, December). Using Facebook as an Informal Learning Environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(10), 207. Retrieved 2020-05-25, from http://www.ajpe.org/doi/abs/10.5688/ajpe7510207 doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510207
10.
ChangC.-M.HsuM.-H. (2016, September). Understanding the determinants of users’ subjective well-being in social networking sites: an integration of social capital theory and social presence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(9), 720–729. Retrieved 2020-05-23, from https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1141321 (Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1141321) doi: 10.1080/ 0144929X.2016.1141321
11.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007, July). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. Retrieved 2020-05-25, from https://academic.oup.Com/jcmc/article/12/4/1143-1168/4582961 doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
12.
FuglerudK. S.TjøstheimI.GunnarssonB. R.TollefsenM. (2012). Use of Social Media by People with Visual Impairments: Usage Levels, Attitudes and Barriers. In MiesenbergerK.KarshmerA.PenazP.ZaglerW. (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 565–572). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_85
13.
GrowS. J. L.TowersA.YeungP.AlpassF.StephensC. (2015, November). The Relationship between Loneliness and Perceived Quality of Life among Older Persons with Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(6), 487–499. Retrieved 2020-05-23, from https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1510900606 (Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc) doi: 10.1177/0145482X1510900606
14.
LeahyD.BroinU. (2009). Social Networking Sites and Equal Opportunity: The Impact of Accessibility. In BLED 2009 Proceedings (Vol. 41, p. 16).
15.
MAXQDA. (n.d.). MAXQDA: Qualitative Data Analysis Software | Windows & Mac. Retrieved 2019-07-18, from https://www.maxqda.com/
16.
MerriamS. B.KeeY. (2014, May). Promoting Community Wellbeing: The Case for Lifelong Learning for Older Adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(2), 128–144. Retrieved 2020-05-25, from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741713613513633 doi: 10.1177/0741713613513633
17.
NabiR. L.PrestinA.SoJ. (2013, June). Facebook Friends with (Health) Benefits? Exploring Social Network Site Use and Perceptions of Social Support, Stress, and Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 721–727. Retrieved 2020-0523, from https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cyber.2012.0521 (Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers) doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0521
18.
NobreC. N.MeirelesM. R. G.SilvaD. B. F. D.FariaA. H.VieiraN. (2018, October). Emotionally Oriented Analysis of the Experiences of Visually Impaired People on Facebook. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 11(3), 1–21. Retrieved 2020-05-20, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3230739 doi: 10.1145/3230739
VoykinskaV.AzenkotS.WuS.LeshedG. (2016). How Blind People Interact with Visual Content on Social Networking Services. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing -CSCW ‘16 (pp. 1582–1593). San Francisco, California, USA: ACM Press. Retrieved 2019-07-12, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2818048.2820013 doi: 10.1145/2818048.2820013
21.
WisniewskiP.XuH.RossonM. B.PerkinsD. F.CarrollJ. M. (2016, May). Dear Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3919–3930). San Jose California USA: ACM. Retrieved 2020-03-31, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858317 doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858317
22.
WuS.AdamicL. A. (2014). Visually impaired users on an online social network. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems -CHI ‘14 (pp. 3133–3142). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM Press. Retrieved 2019-07-12, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2556288.2557415 doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557415
