Using a simulated baggage screening task, we investigated two literature-supported mitigation strategies for reducing the negative effects of task switching, namely less frequent switching and memory support. The study replicates widely reported switching effects on a complex task. The results also show that people can improve performance when provided memory support. When task switching, people can struggle to retrieve the correct task instruction due to the automatic process behind functional memory decay. Memory support reduces the negative effects of functional decay by providing people a reminder.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportA.StylesE. A.HsiehS. (1994). Shifting Intentional Set: Exploring the Dynamic Control of Tasks.
2.
AllportA.WylieG. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and PerformanceXVIII, 35–70.
3.
AltmannE. M. (2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 287–297.
4.
AltmannE. M.GrayW. D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science, 13(1), 27–33.
5.
AltmannE. M.GrayW. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115(3), 602.
MeiranN. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1423.
8.
PeirceJ.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203.
9.
RogersR. D.MonsellS. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207.
10.
VerdeM. F.MacmillanN. A.RotelloC. M. (2006). Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false alarm rate: The accuracy, precision, and robustness of′, Az, and A’. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(4), 643–654.
11.
WylieG.AllportA. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.” Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 212–233.
12.
ZishK.ErchovS.EisertJ.McKeeC.EndresD.BandD. (2020). Effects of Task Switching In Baggage Screeners. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 64(1), 381–385.
