Looming in Forensics: Misapplication,Correction and Extension

Abstract

In recent litigation Human Factors Experts have been misapplying the analysis of the looming threshold for offset motions. Looming (or image size expansion) analysis is appropriate for a rapid direct approach to an object (i.e., rear-end collisions) but is inappropriate for offset motions. Typically, looming threshold analysis is applied to nighttime driving when approaching a slow-moving or stopped vehicle presenting no visual cues other than rear tail lights. This paper lays out the foundation for looming, derives the accepted mathematical equation, and compares it to the rate of visual angle change, which is more applicable to offset motions. An appropriate offset looming threshold equation is derived. In addition, a special case of collision due to looming combined with lateral motion is addressed which has historical significance in open water vessel navigation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Green

(2008) Collision analysis. In Green

Allen

M.J.

Abrams

B.S.

Wientraub

(Eds.), Forensic Vision with Application to Highway Safety—3^rd Edition, Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company

Maddox

M.E.

Kiefer

(2012) Looming threshold limits and their use in forensic practice, Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56^th Annual Meeting, 700704, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

McGehee

D.V.

Brown

Wilson

(1997). Examination of drivers’ collision avoidance behavior in a stationary lead vehicle situation using a front-to-rear-end collision warning system. USDOT/NHTSA Office of Crash Avoidance Research Technical Report. Contract DTNH22-93-C-07326.

Mortimer

R.G.

(1979). Field test evaluation of rear lighting deceleration signals: I-Analytical and experimental studies. U.S. Dept. of Transportation Rept. DOT-HS-805-061.

Mortimer

R.G.

(1990) Perceptual factors in rear-end crashes, Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34^th Annual Meeting, 591–594, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Muttart

J.W.

Messerschmidt

W.F.

Gillen

L.G.

(2005). Relationship between relative velocity detection and driver response times in vehicle following situations. Proceedings of the 2005 SAE World Congress. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.