Driverless shared automated vehicles (SAVs) have the potential to substantially improve independent mobility for the growing number of older adults and people with disabilities who are unable or ineligible to drive. However, early designs and deployments of SAVs have lacked accommodations for people with disabilities. This article describes a case study where post-production modifications were performed on a commercial electric SAV in an attempt to comply with US accessibility guidelines for conventional vehicles. Findings emphasize the key human factors considerations for physical accessibility and some lessons learned in order to inform the broader conversation about the accessible design of emerging SAVs. The case study highlights the need for considering accessibility and usability early in the design of complex technological systems such as automated vehicles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattistiniR.MantecchiniL.PostorinoM. N. (2020). Users’ Acceptance of Connected and Automated Shuttles for Tourism Purposes: A Survey Study. Sustainability, 12(23), 10188. DOI: 10.3390/su122310188
2.
BharathyA.D’SouzaC. (2018a). Revisiting Clear Floor Area Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Device Users in Public Transportation. Transportation Research Record, 2672(8), pp: 675–685. DOI: 10.1177/0361198118787082
3.
BharathyA.D’SouzaC. (2018b). A Web-Based Design Resource for Wheelchair Anthropometry and Accessibility in the Built Environment (Paper No. 237). Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Meeting of RESNA, Washington, DC, July 2018. Accessed online at: https://bit.ly/2VDXOiD
4.
ClaypoolH.Bin-NunA.GerlachJ. (2017). Self-driving cars: The impact on people with disabilities [White paper]. Ruderman Family Foundation, Newton, MA.
5.
CochranA. L. (2020) Understanding the Role of Transportation- Related Social Interaction in Travel Behavior and Health; A Qualitative Study of Adults with Disabilities. Journal of Transport and Health, 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100948
6.
CreggerJ.DawesM.FischerS.LowenthalC.MachekE.PerlmanD. (2018). Low-Speed Automated Shuttles: State of the Practice (Report No. FHWA-JPO-18-692). John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, USDOT.
7.
Fanas RojasJ.TabattanonK.GobervilleN.SandhuN.KielM.D’SouzaC.AsherZ. D. (2020). A Case-Study Evaluating the Performance of an Autonomous Electric Shuttle Modified for Wheelchair Access. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
JoewonoT. B.KubotaH. (2007) Exploring Negative Experience and User Loyalty in Paratransit. Transportation Research Record, No. 2034, pp. 134–142. DOI: 10.3141/2034-15
10.
LenkerJ. A.NasarwanjiM.PaquetV.FeathersD. (2011). A tool for Rapid Assessment of Product Usability and Universal Design: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Testing. Work, 39, pp: 141–150. DIO: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1160
11.
NCD (2015). Self-Driving Cars: Mapping Access to a Technology Revolution (Publication No. 01656924). National Council on Disability (NCD), Washington, DC.
12.
NYLPI (2018). Left Behind: New York’s For-Hire Vehicle Industry Continues to Exclude People with Disabilities. [White Paper]. New York Lawyers for the Public Interest (NYLPI), New York, NY.
13.
ODEP (2019). Autonomous Vehicles: Driving Employment for People with Disabilities – Information Brief. Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP), US Dept. of Labor.
14.
PerezB.ChoiJ.PaquetV.LenkerJ.KocherL.NemadeM.KernC.SteinfeldE. (2019) Comparison of wheelchair securement systems designed for use in large accessible transit vehicles (LATVs), Assistive Technology, pp. 1949–3614. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1604582
15.
PessaroB. (2016). Evaluation of Automated Vehicle Technology in Transit – 2016 Update (Report No. N/A). National Center for Transit Research, CUTR.
16.
ShaheenSCohenA. (2019). Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling, Transport Reviews, 39:4, pp: 427–442, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728
17.
Stantec and Applied Research Associates (2020). Impacts and Opportunities Around Land Use and Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility (NCHRP Project Report 20-113F). Transportation Research Board Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility Forum, Transportation Research Board.
18.
StockerA.ShaheenS. (2017) Shared automated vehicles: Review of business models (Discussion Paper, No. 2017-09). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum.
19.
TabattanonK.SandhuN.D’SouzaC. (2019). Accessible Design of Low-Speed Automated Shuttles: A Brief Review of Lessons Learned from Public Transit. Proceedings of the 63rd HFES Annual Meeting, pp: 526–530. DOI: 10.1177/1071181319631362.
WHO (2002). A Practical Manual for Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva.
