Studying Robot Vacuums Using Online Retailer Reviews to Understand Human-Automation Interaction

Abstract

Robot vacuums are a type of every-day automation and may serve as a possible domain for studying human-automation interactions. Online reviews of four models of autonomous robot vacuums, representing different levels of price and automation, were collected from multiple retailers to understand user interactions and issues encountered. Using a thematic analysis, reviews were categorized into three themes: prior experience with robot vacuums, navigation, and mapping, and troubleshooting issues. The results suggested that new users were more satisfied with their robots than experienced users. Furthermore, price and brand name may influence users’ mental models of their vacuums. Owners of more expensive vacuums appeared less willing to change their behavior to accommodate the vacuum’s limitations. These findings suggest that robot vacuums may be a useful gateway domain for understanding everyday-users’ interactions with automation, and that online reviews are a potential source of information on user experiences.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abraham

Seppelt

Mehler

Reimer

(2017). What’s in a Name: Vehicle Technology Brnading & Consumer Expectations for Automation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 226–234). Oldenburg: Association for Computing Machinery.

Bhole

Hanna

(2017). The effectiveness of online reviews in the presence of self-selection bias. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 108–123.

Forster

Hergeth

Naujoks

Beggiato

Krems

J. F.

(2019). Learning and Development of Mental Models during Interactions with Driving Automation: A Simulator Study. Proceedings of the Tenth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 398–404). Santa Fe: Public Policy Center of Iowa.

Forster

Kraus

Feinauer

Baumann

(2018). Calibration of Trust Expectancies in Conditionally Automated Driving by Brand, Reliability Information and Introductionary Videos: An Online Study. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 118–128). Toronto: Association for Computing Machinery.

Fröhlich

Baldauf

Meneweger

Tscheligi

de Ruyter

Paterno

(2020). Everyday automation experience: a research agenda. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 725–734.

Honig

Bartal

Oron-Gilad

(2020). Using Customers’ Online Reviews to Identify and Classify Human Robot Interaction Failures in Domestic Robots. HRI ‘20: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 251–253). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Hwang

Shim

Choi

(2016). Exploration of User Experience Research Method with Big Data Analysis: Focusing on the Online Review Analysis of Echo. The Journal of Korea Contents Association, 517–528.

Invention of Robotic Vacuum Cleaners . (2021). Retrieved from Vacuum Cleaner History: http://www.vacuumcleanerhistory.com/vacuum-cleaner-development/history-of-robotic-vacuum-cleaner/

Kalaichelavan

Malik

Husnu

Sreenath

(2020). What Do People Complain About Drone Apps? A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Google Play Store Reviews. Procedia Computer Science, 547–554.

10.

Loup Ventures. (2019, May). Robotic vacuum cleaner market revenue worldwide from 2015 to 2025. Retrieved from Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1022991/worldwide-robotic-vacuum-cleaner-revenue/

11.

Nees

M. A.

(2016). Acceptance of Self-driving Cars: An Examination of Idealized versus Realistic Portrayals with a Self- driving Car Acceptance Scale. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, (pp. 1449–1453).

12.

Singer

Jenness

J. W.

(2020). Impact of Information on Consumer Understanding of a Partially Automated Driving System. Washington D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.