Virtual and augmented reality have made it possible to test new technologies for military missions - such as using augmented reality to support complicated subterranean (sub-t) missions. The military will soon offer operators the ability to wear augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) while conducting missions. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how this emerging technology will positively and negatively impact Soldiers’ ability to execute missions. This paper describes the development of a virtual reality (VR) scenario designed to support user experience research for evaluating the efficacy of Soldier AR systems during sub-t operations. We describe usability test results that captured feedback and reactions to the VR scenario and the AR interface that presented critical information through a VR HMD. We conclude with lessons learned from our development process and future research plans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlissJ. P.TidwellP. D.GuestM. A. (1997). The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Administering Spatial Navigation Training to Firefighters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.1.73
2.
CliffordR. M. S.KhanH.HoermannS.BillinghurstM.LindemanR. W. (2018). The Effect of Immersive Displays on Situation Awareness in Virtual Environments for Aerial Firefighting Air Attack Supervisor Training. 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446139
HartS. G. (2006). Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
HoferP. (2020). The SubSurface Operations Cell: High-value Asset for Decision-Making in Complex SubTerranean/SubSurface Operations. BHMBerg- UndHuttenmannische Monatshefte, 165(12), 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-020-01060-4
10.
IftikharH.ShahP.LuximonY. (2020). Human wayfinding behavior and metrics in complex environments: A systematic literature review. Architectural Science Review, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1777386
11.
KimH. K.ParkJ.ChoiY.ChoeM. (2018). Virtual reality sickness questionnaire (VRSQ): Motion sickness measurement index in a virtual reality environment. Applied Ergonomics, 69, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.016
12.
KostakosP.AlavesaP.KorkiakoskiM.MarquesM. M.LoboV.DuarteF. (2021). Wired to Exit: Exploring the Effects of Wayfinding Affordances in Underground Facilities Using Virtual Reality. Simulation & Gaming, 52(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120944567
13.
SchraufM.SonnleitnerA.SimonM.KincsesW. E. (2011). EEG Alpha Spindles as Indicators for Prolonged Brake Reaction Time During Auditory Secondary Tasks in a Real Road Driving Study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551045
SpainR.GoldbergB.KhooshabehP.KrumD.BiroJ.LinderC.StanleyL.TredinnickR.PontoK.GisickL.PierceM.KeeblerJ.YoungP.HancockA.PhillipsJ.SteinhauserN.NiehausJ.FlynnJ. (2019). Applications of Virtual Environments in Human Factors Research and Practice. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 2308–2312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631393
YokoiK.YabukiN.FukudaT.MichikawaT.MotamediA. (2015). Way-Finding Assistance System For Underground Facilities Using Augmented Reality. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,XL-4/W5, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W5-37-2015
20.
ZamanF.RoecaG.IntriligatorD. J.GardonyD. A.RifeJasonDr.. (2021). Analyzing Spatial Memory in a Virtual Reality-Based Subterranean Scenario: Implication for Military Augmented Reality Systems. 4.
