The goal of this study is to examine the neural correlates of different mental workload levels. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were recorded when participants perform a set of tasks simultaneously with low and high levels of mental workload. Brain connections for each workload level were estimated using Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM), which is an effective connectivity method to reveal causal relationships between brain sources. The result showed a backward-only, left-lateralized connection pattern for high workload condition, compared to the bidirectional, two-sided connection pattern for low workload condition.These findings of the mental workload effect on neural mechanisms may be utilized in applications of the augmented cognition program.
BonnefondM.KastnerS.JensenO.(2017). Communication between brain areas based on nested oscillations. eNeuro, 4(2). doi: 10.1523/ ENEURO.0153-16.2017
3.
BowersM. A. (2013). The Effects of Workload Transitions in a Multitasking Environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
4.
CausseM.ChuaZ.PeysakhovichV.Del CampoN.MattonN. (2017). Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Sci. Rep., 7(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05378-x
5.
De GreefT.Van DongenK.GrootjenM.LindenbergJ. (2007). Augmenting cognition: Reviewing the symbiotic relation between man and machine. In Found. augment. cogn. (Vol. 4565 LNAI, pp. 439–448). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73216-7_51
6.
DelormeA.MullenT.KotheC.Akalin AcarZ.Bigdely-ShamloN.VankovA.MakeigS. (2011). EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New tools for advanced EEG processing. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011. doi: 10.1155/2011/130714
7.
DimitrakopoulosG. N.KakkosI.DaiZ.LimJ.DesouzaJ. J.BezerianosA.SunY. (2017). Task-Independent Mental Workload Classification Based Upon Common Multiband EEG Cortical Connectivity. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 25(11), 1940–1949. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2701002
8.
EggemeierF. T.O’DonellR. D. (1982). A conceptual framework for development of a workload assessment methodology (Tech. Rep.). Wright State University and Systems Research Laboratories.
9.
EspositoF.OttoT.ZijlstraF. R.GoebelR. (2014). Spatially distributed effects of mental exhaustion on resting-state FMRI networks. PLoS One, 9(4), 1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094222
10.
FunkeM. E.WarmJ. S.MatthewsG.FinomoreV.VidulichM. A.KnottB. A.… ParasuramanR. (2011). Static and dynamic discriminations in vigilance: Effects on cerebral hemodynamics and workload. Advances in understanding human performance: Neuroergonomics, human factors design, and special populations, 80–90.
11.
GongD.LiY.YanY.YaoY.GaoY.LiuT.MaW. (2019). The highworking load states induced by action real-time strategy gaming : An EEG power spectrum and network study. Neuropsychologia, 131(May), 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.002
12.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Adv. psychol. (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Elsevier.
13.
HasegawaM.CarpenterP. A.JustM. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. Neuroimage, 15(3), 647– 660. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1001
14.
HumphreyD. G.KramerA. F. (1994). Toward a psychophysiological assessment of dynamic changes in mental workload. Hum. Factors, 36(1), 3–26. doi: 10.1177/001872089403600101
15.
KellerT. A.CarpenterP. A.JustM. A. (2001). The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fmri examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cerebral cortex, 11(3), 223–237.
16.
KimN.HouseR.YunM. H.NamC. S. (2019). Neural Correlates of Workload Transition in Multitasking: An ACT-R Model of Hysteresis Effect. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12: 535.
17.
KimuraD. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 15(3), 166.
18.
KolesZ. J.Flor-HenryP. (1981). Mental activity and the e.e.g.: Task and workload related effects. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 19(2), 185–194. doi: 10.1007/BF02442714
19.
LacadieC. M.FulbrightR. K.AroraJ.ConstableR.PapademetrisX. (2008). Brodmann Areas defined in MNI space using a new Tracing Tool in BioImage Suite. In Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the organization for human brain mapping (Vol. 771).
20.
LitvakV.MattoutJ.KiebelS.PhillipsC.HensonR.KilnerJ.… FristonK. (2011). EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011(June2016). doi: 10.1155/2011/852961
21.
LohmannG.ErfurthK.MüllerK.TurnerR. (2012, feb). Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2322–2329. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S1053811911010718 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.025
22.
MaL.SteinbergJ. L.HasanK. M.NarayanaP. A.KramerL. A.MoellerF. G. (2012). Working memory load modulation of parietofrontal connections: Evidence from dynamic causal modeling. Hum. Brain Mapp., 33(8), 1850–1867. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21329
23.
MatthewsG.Reinerman-JonesL.WohleberR.LinJ.MercadoJ.AbichJ. (2015). Workload is multidimensional, not unitary: what now? In International conference on augmented cognition (pp. 44–55).
24.
MillerW. D.SchmidtK. D.EsteppJ. R.BowersM. (2014). an Updated Version of the U. S. Air Force Multi- Attribute Task Battery ( Af-Matb).
NiendamT. A.LairdA. R.RayK. L.DeanY. M.GlahnD. C.CarterC. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 12(2), 241–268. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5
27.
O’DonellR. D.EggemeierF. T. (1986). Handbook of perception and human performance: cognitive processes and human performance. KR, ale New York Wiley.
28.
ParasC. R. (2015). Exploring Physiological Measures for Prediction and Identification of the Redline of Cognitive Workload (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
29.
PopovT.PopovaP.HarkotteM.AwiszusB.RockstrohB.MillerG. A. (2018). Cross-frequency interactions between frontal theta and posterior alpha control mechanisms foster working memory. Neuroimage, 181(March), 72 8–733. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.067 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.067
30.
RoscoeA. H.EllisG. A. (1990). A subjective rating scale for assessing pilot workload in flight: A decade of practical use (Tech. Rep.). ROYAL AEROSPACE ESTABLISHMENT FARNBOROUGH (UNITED KINGDOM).
31.
SakkalisV. (2011). Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG. Comput. Biol. Med., 41(12), 1110–1117. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.020 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.020
32.
SharbroughF.ChatrianG.LesserR.LudersH.NuwerM.PictonT. (1991). American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature. Clinical Neurophysiology(8), 200–202.
33.
SandersN.ChooS.KimN.NamC. S. (2019). Neural Correlates of Trust During an Automated System Monitoring Task: Preliminary Results of An EEG Effective Connectivity Study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society’s 63rd Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 83–87). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
34.
SmithE. E.JonidesJ.KoeppeR. A. (1996). Dissociating Verbal and Spatial Working Memory Using PET. Cereb. Cortex, 6(1), 11–20. doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.1.11
35.
WassermanL. (1997). Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging 2. A PEDAGOGICAL EXAMPLE. Presented at the Mathematical Psyc hology Symposium on “Methods for Model Selection”(1995), 1–17.
36.
WoodwardT. S.CairoT. A.RuffC. C.TakaneY.HunterM. A.NganE. T. (2006). Functional connectivity reveals load dependent neural systems underlying encoding and maintenance in verbal working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.043
37.
YoungM. S.BrookhuisK. A.WickensC. D.HancockP. A. (2015). State of science: mental workload in ergonomics (Vol. 58) (No. 1). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139 .2014.956151 doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
