Investigating a Virtual Reality-based Emergency Response Scenario and Intelligent User Interface for First Responders

Abstract

Because advances in broadband capabilities will soon allow first responders to access and use many forms of data when responding to emergencies, it is becoming critically important to design heads-up displays to present first responders with information in a manner that does not induce extraneous mental workload or cause undue interaction errors. Virtual reality offers a unique medium for envisioning and testing user interface concepts in a realistic and controlled environment. In this paper, we describe a virtual reality-based emergency response scenario that was designed to support user experience research for evaluating the efficacy of intelligent user interfaces for firefighters. We describe the results of a usability test that captured firefighters’ feedback and reactions to the VR scenario and the prototype intelligent user interface that presented them with task critical information through the VR headset. The paper concludes with lessons learned from our development process and a discussion of plans for future research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aïm

Lonjon

Hannouche

Nizard

(2016). Effectiveness of virtual reality training in orthopedic surgery. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 32(1), 224-232.

Baldwin

C. L.

Lewis

B. A.

(2014). Perceived urgency mapping across modalities within a driving context. Applied Ergonomics, 45(5), 1270-1277.

Branch

R. M.

(2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media.

Choong

Y. Y.

Dawkins

Greene

Theofanos

(2017). Incident scenarios collection for public safety communications research. (NISTIR 8181). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2017/NIST.IR.8181.p df

Griffith

Ablanedo

Dwyer

(2017). Leveraging a virtual environment to prepare for school shootings. In International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (pp. 325-338). Springer, Cham.

Little

(2017). The NASA Augmented/Virtual Reality Lab: The State of the Art at KSC.

Oberhauser

Dreyer

Braunstingl

Koglbauer

(2018). What’s real about virtual reality flight simulation? Comparing the fidelity of a virtual reality with a conventional flight simulation environment. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 8(1), 22-34.

Savage-Knepshield

P. A.

(2007). Usability testing for rapid fielding with small N s: Lessons learned during an army operational field experiment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 51, No. 26, pp. 1622-1626). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Singer

M. J.

Knerr

B. W.

(2010). Evaluation of a game-based simulation during distributed exercises. (Research Report 1931). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

10.

Taylor

G. S.

Barnett

J. S.

(2013). Evaluation of wearable simulation interface for military training. Human factors, 55(3), 672-690.