AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
2.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
3.
AkerstedtT.GillbergM. (1990). Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 52(1-2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459008994241
4.
BeckD.LeeM.ParkW. (2017). A comparative evaluation of in-vehicle side view displays layouts in critical lane changing situation. Ergonomics, 60(12), 1682–1691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1343958
5.
BernhardC.HechtH. (2020). The ups and downs of camera-monitor systems: The effect of camera position on rearward distance perception. Human Factors. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819895866
6.
DaumS. O.HechtH. (2009). Distance estimation in vista space. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(5), 1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.5.1127
7.
FlannaganM. J.MeffordM. L. (2005). Distance perception with a camera-based rear vision system in actual driving. In The 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Symposium conducted at the meeting of University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
8.
FlannaganM. J.SivakM.MeffordM. L. (2002). Distance perception in camera-based rear vision systems (2002-01-0012). Detroit, Michigan, USA. SAE Technical Paper. https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0012
9.
HechtH.LandwehrK.BothB. (2015). Effects of distance and eye-height on time-to-contact estimates. Movement & Sport Sciences-Science & Motricité, 89, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2014010
10.
KeshavarzB.HechtH. (2011). Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811403736
11.
LargeD. R.CrundallE.BurnettG.HarveyC.KonstantopoulosP. (2016). Driving without wings: The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behaviour, performance and opinions of drivers. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.003
12.
LeyrerM.LinkenaugerS. A.BülthoffH. H.MohlerB. J. (2015). Eye height manipulations: A possible solution to reduce underestimation of egocentric distances in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699254
13.
MurataA.KohnoY. (2018). Effectiveness of replacement of automotive side mirrors by in-vehicle LCD–Effect of location and size of LCD on safety and efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 66, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.03.010
14.
OoiT. L.WuB.HeZ. J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414(6860), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102562
15.
SchmidtE. A.HoffmannH.KrautscheidR.BierbachMaximFreyAlexanderGailJ.Lotz-KeensC. (2016). Camera-monitor systems as a replacement for exterior mirrors in cars and trucks. In TerzisA. (Ed.), Augmented Vision and Reality: Vol. 5. Handbook of camera monitoring systems. The automotive mirror-replacement technology based on ISO 16505 (pp. 369–436). Springer International Publishing.
16.
StewardD.CudworthC. J.LishmanJ. R. (1993). Misperception of time-to-collision by drivers in pedestrian accidents. Perception, 22, 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1068/p221227