Extended Abstract: The Role of Choice and Rest Break Length in A Vigilance Task

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davies

D.R.

Parasuraman

(1982). The psychology of vigilance. London, UK: Academic.

Deci

E. L.

Eghrari

Patrick

B. C.

Leone

(1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.

Dember

W. N.

Galinsky

T. L.

Warm

J. S.

(1992). The role of choice in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(3), 201-204.

Finkbeiner

K. M.

Wilson

K. M.

Russell

P. N.

Helton

W. S.

(2015). The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task. Experimental brain research, 233(4), 1061-1068.

Helton

W. S.

Russell

P. N.

(2011). Feature absence–presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention. Psychological research, 75(5), 384-392.

Helton

W. S.

Russell

P. N.

(2012). Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused. Experimental brain research, 219(1), 37-46.

Helton

W. S.

Russell

P. N.

(2015). Rest is best: The role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance. Cognition, 134, 165-173.

Parasuraman

Warm

J.S.

Dember

W.N.

(1987). Vigilance: Taxonomy and utility. In Mark

L.S.

Warm

J.S.

Huston

R.I.

(eds.), Ergonomics and Human Factors (pp. 11-32). New York, NY: Springer.

Warm

J. S.

(Ed.). (1984). Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 15-59). New York: Wiley.