Distracted driving and its negative effects on driving performance are well documented. Eye movement patterns of distracted drivers have also been studied, though insight into what the driver specifically looks at is not as well understood. Researchers have studied eye movement metrics like, eyes-off-road glance times, time-to-first-fixation, among others, over an entire drive, but not what the driver is looking at in a specific moment in time. The current study used eye tracking to investigate what objects and areas people looked at in driving scenes and what they reported they would look at later in the same scenes. The results suggest that people look where they say they would look, but not in the order they reported they would look. This finding demonstrates that participants may scrutinize scenes differently at various times, but attend to the same objects or areas, indicating an associated importance, semantic constraints, and relevance for driving.
BurgeR.ChaparroA. (2018). An investigation of the effect of texting on hazard perception using fuzzy signal detection theory (fSDT). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 123–132.
3.
CastelhanoMHendersonJ. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 753–763.
4.
DonnellyN.CaveK.GreenwayR.HadwinJ. A.StevensonJ.Sonuga-BarkeE. (2007). Visual search in children and adults: Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600625362
5.
FoulshamT.WalkerE.KingstoneA. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51(17), 1920–1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.002
Hidalgo-SoteloB.OlivaA.TorralbaA. (2006). Human Learning of Contextual Priors for Object Search: Where does the time go?2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05)-Workshops, 86–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2005.470
8.
Klauer SheilaG.FengG.Bruce Sumons-MortonG.OuimetM. C.Lee SuzanneE.Dingus ThomasA. (2014). Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.02.017
9.
LeeS. E.OlsenE. C. B.Simons-MortonB. (2006). Eyeglance behavior of novice teen and experienced adults drivers. Journal of the Transportation Board (JTRB), No. 1980, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/1980-10
PlantK. L.StantonN. A. (2013). The explanatory power of Schema Theory: theoretical foundations and future applications in Ergonomics. Ergonomics, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.736542
13.
ShinarD. (2008). Looks Are (Almost) Everything: Where Drivers Look to Get Information. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250647
TorralbaA.OlivaA.CastelhanoM. S.HendersonJ. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
16.
TreatJ. R.TumbasN. S.McDonaldS. T.ShinarD.HumeR. D.MayerR. E.StansiferR. L.CastellanN. J. (1979). Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents: final report. In Bmj (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4975.1098
17.
VõM. L. H.WolfeJ. M. (2013). The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes. Cognition, 126(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.017
18.
WickensC. D.GohJ.HelleburgJ.HorreyW. J.TalleurD. A. (2003). Attentional models of multi-task pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors, 45, 360–380.
19.
WinstonF. K. (2014). Adolescence, attention allocation, and driving safety. The Journal of Adolescent Health : Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 54(5), S6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.202
20.
WuC.-C.WickF. A.PomplunM. (2014). Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(FEB), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00054
21.
YoungR. (2012). Cognitive Distraction While Driving: A Critical Review of Definitions and Prevalence in Crashes. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems, 5(1), 2012-01–0967. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0967
