Claypoole VictoriaL.SzalmaJ. L. (2018a). Facilitating sustained attention: Is mere presence sufficient?American Journal of Psychology, 131(4), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.4.0417
3.
ClaypooleVictoria L.SzalmaJ. L. (2018b). Independent Coactors May Improve Performance and Lower Workload: Viewing Vigilance Under Social Facilitation. Human Factors, 60(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818769268
4.
ClaypooleVictoria LynneSzalmaJ. L. (2017). Examining social facilitation in vigilance: a hit and a miss. Ergonomics, 60(11), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1308563
5.
CottrellN. B. (1972). Social Facilitation. In McClintockC. G. (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 185–236). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
DaviesD. R.ParasuramanR. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. Academic Pr.
7.
FlahertyJ.RichmanJ. (1989). Gender differences in the perception and utilization of social support: Theoretical perspectives and an empirical test. Social Science & Medicine, 28(12), 1221-1228.
KorsD. J.LindenW.GerinW. (2011). Evaluation Interferes with Social Support: Effects on Cardiovascular Stress Reactivity in Women. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1997.16.1.1
10.
LindenW.ChambersL.MauriceJ.LenzJ. W. (1993). Sex differences in social support, self-deception, hostility, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity. Health Psychology, 12(5), 376-380. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.5.376
11.
Matthews CampbellS.E.FalconerS.JoynerL.A.HugginsJ.GillilandK.GrierR.G.WarmJ. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2, 315-340. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315
12.
PutzV. R. (1975). The effects of different modes of supervision on vigilance behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 157–160.
13.
SzalmaJ. L.WarmJ. S.MatthewsG.DemberW. N.WeilerE. M.MeierA.EggemeierF. T. (2004). Effects of Sensory Modality and Task Duration on Performance, Workload, and Stress in Sustained Attention. Human Factors, 46(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.2.219.37334
14.
TanakaK.KojoK.MatsuzakiM. (1990). The Effects of Experimentally Provided Social Support on Task Performance and Anxiety. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(3), 65–69.
15.
TardyC. H. (1992). Assessing the Functions of Supportive Messages. Communication Research, 19(2), 175–192.
16.
ThorsteinssonE. B.JamesJ. E. (1999). A meta-analysis of the effects of experimental manipulations of social support during laboratory stress. Psychology and Health, 14(5), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449908407353
17.
WaldfogleG. E.Hagerty-KollerM. R.LaneL. R.GaribaldiA. E.SzalmaJ. L. (2019, November). Exploring Sex Differences in Vigilance Performance with Knowledge of Results. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 1321-1325). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
18.
Warm DemberW.N.J. S. (1998). Tests of vigilance taxonomy. In HoffmanM. F. S. R.R.WarmJ.S. (Ed.), Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember (pp. 87–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful. Human Factors, 50(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x312152