Mobile robotic telepresence (MRP) systems feature a video conferencing interface on a mobile robot, enabling pilot users to remotely control the robot while communicating with a local user. For older adults in an assisted living facility, the operators are mostly caregivers or remote family members. This small-sample usability testing aimed to evaluate the use of MRP by the older adult. Participants navigated the robot to locations in the home, e.g., to check if the front-door is closed. Two levels of automation were introduced; assisted teleoperation and autonomous. Observations revealed that the older adults enjoyed the dexterity with which the robot could be teleoperated in the assisted teleoperation mode. Yet, they preferred the operation of the MRP at the autonomous mode where the robot navigated autonomously towards the locations the user indicated. Usability, preference and objective findings raise awareness regarding elder care assistive robot developmental factors. Future experimental plans are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlanW.FosterL. (2013). Active ageing: Rhetoric, theory and practice. The making of ageing policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
2.
BeerJ. M.TakayamaL. (2011). Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, benefits, and concerns. In HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 19–26). https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957665
3.
CarterS. E.CampbellE. M.Sanson-FisherR. W.RedmanS.GillespieW. J. (1997). Environmental hazards in the homes of older people | Age and Ageing | Oxford Academic. Age and Ageing, 26(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.3.195
4.
CestaA.CortellessaG.OrlandiniA.TiberioL. (2013). Evaluating telepresence robots in the field. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 358, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36907-0_29
5.
CoradeschiS.CestaA.CortellessaG.CoraciL.GonzalezJ.KarlssonL.… OtslundB. (2013). GiraffPlus: Combining social interaction and long term monitoring for promoting independent living. 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI2013, 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2013.6577883
FosterL.WalkerA. (2015). Active and Successful Aging: A European Policy Perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu028
KaberD.EndsleyM. R. (1997). Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Wiley Online Library - American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 16(3), 126–131.
10.
KiselevA.KristofferssonA.MelendezF.GalindoC.LoutfiA.Gonzalez-JimenezJ.CoradeschiS. (2015). Evaluation of using semi-autonomy features in mobile robotic telepresence systems. Proceedings of the 2015 7th IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, CIS 2015 and Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, RAM 2015, (ii), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS.2015.7274564
11.
KiselevA.LoutfiA. (2012). Using a Mental Workload Index as a Measure of Usability of a User Interface for Social Robotic Telepresence. Ro-Man Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence, 3–6.
12.
KristofferssonA.CoradeschiS.LoutfiA. (2013). A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013(3), 17. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2514036
13.
LaubheimerP. (2018). Nielson Norman Group.
14.
MayhornC. B.NicholsT. A.RogersW. A.FiskA. D. (2010). Injury Control and Safety Promotion Hazards in the home: using older adults’ perceptions to inform warning design. https://doi.org/10.1080/156609704/233/327497
15.
OlatunjiS.MarkfeldN.GutmanD.GivatiS.Sarne-FleischmannV.Oron-GiladT.EdanY. (2019). Improving the interaction of Older Adults with Socially Assistive Robots for Table setting. In Eleventh International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2019). Madrid, Spain.
16.
OrlandiniA.KristofferssonA.AlmquistL.BjörkmanP.CortellessaG.GalindoC.… NilssonM. (2016). ExCITE Project: A Review of Forty-two Months of Robotic Telepresence Technology Evolution. MIT Press Journal - Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(3), 204–221.
Sauro. (2012). 10 things to know about the Single Ease Question (SEQ). Measuring U.
19.
ShiarlisK.MessiasJ.Van SomerenM.WhitesonS.KimJ.VroonJ.… MichelH. (2013). TERESA: A Socially Intelligent Semi- autonomous Telepresence System. In 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI). Retrieved from http://www.teresaproject.eu
20.
SmarrC. A.PrakashA.BeerJ. M.MitznerT. L.KempC. C.RogersW. A. (2012). Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561009
21.
SyrdalD. S.DautenhahnK.KoayK.WaltersM. L. (2009). The negative attitudes towards robots scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live human-robot interaction study. 23rd Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificiel Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, AISB, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1.1.159.9791
22.
VagiaM.TransethA. A.FjerdingenS. A. (2016). A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed?Applied Ergonomics, 53, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013
