There is building interest within industry and government to enable Urban Air Mobility (i.e., air-taxies). One concept envisions remotely piloted aircraft, yet it is unclear how this will impact public trust and acceptance. Method: Two hundred participants read vignettes describing remotely-piloted UAM operations and then responded to a series of questionnaires. The study employed a one-way between-subjects design manipulating five levels of Pilot-in-Command Distance: Onboard Pilot; Remote Control Pilot; Dedicated Remote Operator; Remote Operator; System Manager. Results: The Remote Control Pilot group indicated they would be less likely than the Onboard Pilot group to use UAM, based on the mediating effect of trust in the automation. The Remote Control Pilot and Remote Operator groups indicated they would be less likely to use UAM than the Onboard Pilot group, based on the mediating effect of trust in the remote pilot/operator. Conclusion: Trust in UAM automation and remote pilots/operators will likely affect public acceptance of UAM.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdellE.VarhelyiA.NilssonL. (2014). The definition of acceptance and acceptability. In ReganM.A.HorberryT.StevensA. (Eds), Driver Acceptance of New Technology. Theory, Measurement and Optimization (pp. 11-22). Surry, England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D., 2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6 (1), 3-5.
6.
ChanW. N.BarmoreB. E.KiblerJ.LeeP.O’ConnorN.PalopoK.… ZelinskiS. (2018). Overview of NASA’s Air Traffic Management - eXploration (ATM-X) Project. 18th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Atlanta, GA: AIAA.
7.
ChanceyE.T.BlissJ.P.YamaniY.HandleyH.A.H. (2017). Trust and the compliance-reliance paradigm: The effects of risk, error bias, and reliability on trust and dependence. Human Factors, 59 (3), 333-345.
8.
CheungJ. H.BurnsD. K.SinclairR. R.SliterM. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology. An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business Psychology, 32, 347-361.
9.
DavisF. D.BagozziR. P.WarshawP. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8). 982-1003.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications, NY: New York.
14.
HoldenJ.GoelN. (2016). Uber Elevate: Fast-forwarding to a future of on-demand urban air transportation. Retrieved from: https://www.uber.com/elevate.pdf/
15.
LeeJ. D.SeeK. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46 (1), 50-80.
16.
MadsenM.GregorS. (2000). Measuring human-computer trust. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
17.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709-734.
18.
NeesM. A. (2016). Acceptance of self-driving cars: An examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self-driving car acceptance scale. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016 Annual Meeting. (pp. 1449-1453). Washington, D. C: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19.
NordhoffS.de WinterJ.MadiganR.MeratN.van AremB.HappeeR. (2018). User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schoneberg: A questionnaire study. Transportation Research Part F, 58, 843-854.
20.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT. B.WickensC. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30 (3), 286-297.
RiceS.WinterS. R.DohertyS.MilnerM. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of using internet-based survey methods in aviation-related research. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 7 (1), 58-65.
23.
RiceS.WinterS. R.MehtaR.RagbirN. K. (2019). What factors predict the type of person who is willing to fly in an autonomous commercial airplane?Journal of Air Transport Management, 75, 131-138.
24.
SimonM.HoughtonS. M.AquinoK. (1999). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113-134.
25.
ThipphavongD. P.ApazaR. D.BarmoreB. E.BattisteV.BelcastroC. M.BurianB. K.… VermaS. A. (2018). Urban Air Mobility Airspace Integration Concepts and Considerations. 18th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Atlanta, GA: AIAA.
26.
VenkateshV.MorisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
