Despite the complexity of the human hand, most large-scale anthropometric data for the human hand includes minimal measurements. Anthropometric studies are expensive and time-consuming to conduct, and more efficient methods are needed to capture hand data and build large-scale civilian databases to impact product design and human factors analyses. A first of its kind large-scale 3D hand anthropometric database was the result of this study with 398 unique datasets. This database was created at minimal cost and time to researchers to improve accessibility to data and impact the design of products for hands.
GordonC. C.BlackwellC. L.BradtmillerB.ParhamJ. L.BarrientosP.PaquetteS. P.CornerB. D.CarsonJ. M.VeneziaJ. C.RockwellB. M. (2015). 2010–2012 Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. NATICK/TR-15/007. Natick, MA: US Army Natick Research, Development, and Engineering Center.
3.
Gordon ClaireCChurchillT.ClauserC. E.McconvilleJ. T.TebbettsI.WalkerR. A. (1988). 1988 Anthropometric Survey of U. S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. Security.
4.
GreinerT. M. (1991). Hand Anthropometry of US Army Personell. Technical Report Natick, TR-92/011, 434–434.
5.
GriffinL. A.JuhnkeB.SeifertE.PokornyC.DoranK. (2019). Method to Capture and Analyze the Waist-Hip-Thigh Body Region of Seated- Standing 3D Scans. Proceedings of 3DBODY. TECH, 254-265. https://doi.org/10.15221/19.254
6.
GriffinL.KimN.CarufelR.SokolowskiS.LeeH.SeifertE. (2018). Dimensions of the Dynamic Hand: Implications for Glove Design, Fit, and Sizing. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 38–48.
7.
GriffinL.SokolowskiS.LeeH.SeifertE.KimN.CarufelR. (2018). Methods and Tools for 3D Measurement of Hands and Feet. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 49–58.
8.
GriffinL.SokolowskiS.SeifertE. (2018). Process considerations in 3D hand anthropometric data collection. Proceedings of 3DBODY. TECH, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.15221/18.121
9.
KueblerT.LuebkeA.CampbellJ.GuenzelT. (2019). Size North America–The New North American Anthropometric Survey. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 88–98.
10.
LiZ.ChangC. C.DempseyP. G.OuyangL.DuanJ. (2008). Validation of a three-dimensional hand scanning and dimension extraction method with dimension data. Ergonomics, 51(11), 1672–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802287280
11.
RobinetteK. M.BlackwellS.DaanenH.BoehmerM.FlemingS. (2002). Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR), Final Report. Volume 1. Summary. SYTRONICS INC DAYTON OH.
12.
RobinetteK. M.DaanenH. (2003). Lessons learned from CAESAR: A 3- D anthropometric survey. Air Force Research Lab Wright-Patterson AFB OH.
13.
RobinetteK. M.DaanenH.PaquetE. (1999). The CAESAR project: A 3-D surface anthropometry survey. Second International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No. PR00062), 380–386.
