The use of non-spatial strategies in the Direction Orientation Task

Abstract

Spatial ability has been identified as one of the skills needed to be a pilot. However, the test used by the military to measure this ability, the Direction Orientation Task (DOT), has a number of problems. The DOT2, was developed to address issues such as a ceiling effect and the limited number of possible trials. The initial DOT2 validation was done with a group of Naval Aviators, however the current study sought to collect further evidence, within a more variable population. A group of students completed the new DOT2 task, along with a survey on strategy use. We found that the percentage of time participants reported using a math strategy on the task was highly correlated with accuracy whereas the use of a spatial strategy was negatively correlated with accuracy. A similar mathematical solution can be applied to the original DOT, suggesting neither tests may be measuring spatial ability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barron

L. G.

Rose

M. R.

(2013). Relative validity of distinct spatial abilities: An example with implications for diversity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(4), 400–406.

Guilford

J. P.

Lacey

J. I.

(1947). Printed classification tests: US Government Printing Office.

Hegarty

(2010). Components of spatial intelligence Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 52, pp. 265-297): Elsevier.

Hegarty

Waller

(2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In Shah

Miyake

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121-169). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Imhoff

D. L.

Levine

J. M.

(1981). Perceptual-Motor and Cognitive Performance Task-Battery for Pilot Selection (AFHRL-TR-80-27). Retrieved from Brooks Air Force Base, TX:

Keiser

H. N.

Moclaire

C. M.

King

K. M.

Brown

N. L.

Foroughi

C. K.

Sibley

Coyne

J. T.

(2019). Updating the Direction Orientation Task: An Aviation Selection Tool. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (1414-1418).

Lohman

D. F.

(1996). Spatial ability and g. In Dennis

Tapstield

(Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (Vol. 97-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Momen

(2009). The effects of alternative input devices and repeated exposures on the Test of Basic Aviation Skills (TBAS) performance. Military Medicine, 174(12), 1282-1286.

Olde

B. A.

Walker

P. B.

(2006). The Automatic Pilot Examination (APEX): The Navy’s online testing system for selecting Naval Aviators. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.