Dynamic resilience is a temporal process that reflects individuals’ capability to overcome task-induced stress and sustain their performance during task-related events. First-order autoregressive (AR(1)) modelling is posited for measuring individuals’ dynamic resilience over time. The current research investigated this by testing 30 adults in a dynamic decision-making task. AR(1) modelling was conducted on the data, and was compared against a modified seismic resilience metric for concurrent validity purposes. Results revealed that AR(1) modeled parameters are applicable in assessing participants’ dynamic resilience, with analyses supporting their use to distinguish between individuals that can overcome task-induced stress and those that cannot, as well as, in the classification of individuals’ dynamic resilience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AidmanE. (2019). Cognitive Fitness Framework: Towards Assessing, Training and Augmenting Individual-Difference Factors Underpinning High-Performance Cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 1-9.
2.
BruneauM.ChangS.EguchiR.LeeG.O’RourkeT.ReinhornA.ShinozukaM.TierneyK.WallaceW.von WinterfeldtD. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities, Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
3.
CicchettiD. (2010). Resilience under conditions of extreme stress: a multilevel perspective. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 9(3), 145–154.
4.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76-82.
5.
CrameriL.HettiarachchiI.HanounS. (2019). A Review of Individual Operational Cognitive Readiness: Theory Development and Future Directions. HUMAN FACTORS.
6.
DaiL.VorselenD.KorolevK. S.GoreJ. (2012). Generic Indicators for Loss of Resilience Before a Tipping Point Leading to Population Collapse. Science, 336(6085), 1175-1177.
7.
DakosV.van NesE. H.D’OdoricoP.SchefferM. (2012). Robustness of variance and autocorrelation as indicators of critical slowing down. Ecology, 93(2), 264-271.
8.
HillY.Den HartighR. J. R.MeijerR. R.De JongeP.Van YperenN. W. (2018). REPLY The Temporal Process of Resilience. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, 7(4), 363–370.
9.
HillY.Den HartighR. J. R.MeijerR. R.De JongeP.Van YperenN. W. (2018). Resilience in sports from a dynamical perspective. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7, 333–341.
10.
HancockP. A.WarmJ. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.
11.
PoleN. (2007). The psychophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 133(5), 725–46.
12.
Santiago-EspadaY.MyerR. R.LatorellaK. A.ComstockJ. RJr. (2011). The Multi-Attribute Task Battery II (MATB-II) software for human performance and workload research: a user’s guide. Langley Research Center, Virginia.
SinclairV., G.WallstonK., A. (2004). The development and psychometric evaluation of the brief resilient coping scale. Assessment, 11(1), 94–101.
15.
SouthwickS. M.VythilingamM.CharneyD. S. (2005). The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: Implications for prevention and treatment. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1, 255–291.
16.
WalkerF. R.PfingstK.CarnevaliL.SgoifoA.NalivaikoE. (2017). In the search for integrative biomarker of resilience to psychological stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 74, 310–320.
17.
WalkerF. R.ThomsonA.PfingstK.VlemincxE.AidmanE.NalivaikoE. (2019). Habituation of the electrodermal response - A biological correlate of resilience?PLOS ONE, 1, 1-17.
18.
WangP.FangW.GuoB. (2017). A colored petri nets based workload evaluation model and its validation through Multi-Attribute Task Battery-II. Applied Ergonomics, 60, 260–274.
19.
WindleGBennettKMNoyesJ.A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1):8-25.
20.
ZhuJ.KuskeR.ErneuxT. (2014). Tipping points near a delayed saddle node bifurcation with periodic forcing. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 14(4), 2030–2068.
