Children with medical complexity (CMC) rely on family caregivers to provide advanced medical care in the home. Yet, family caregivers are often under-supported. To better support family caregivers, we must understand and identify the ways that the work system is not designed to support their work. Work system adaptations can uncover where the work system is not designed to support the worker. This study sought to identify and categorize caregiver adaptations to the work system. We conducted 30 home-visit interviews with caregivers of CMC. Inductive content analysis revealed that family caregivers were making work system adaptations on multiple levels including: medical devices, direct care, auxiliary care, and integration of caregiving into everyday life. Our findings imply that family caregivers are attempting to address barriers on multiple levels by adapting the work system. Critical next steps should create system interventions to address the mismatch between the caregivers’ needs and the work system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-MasslawiD.HandfieldS.FelsS.LeaR.CurrieL. M. (2017). User-Centered Mapping of Nurses’ Workarounds to Design Principles for Interactive Systems in Home Wound Care. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 314–323.
2.
AlterS. (2014). Theory of Workarounds. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(55), 1041-1066.
3.
CarayonP.HundtA.S.KarshB.-T.GursesA.P.AlvaradoC.J.SmithM.BrennanP.F. (2006). Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in . Health Care, 15 (Suppl. I), i50–i58.
4.
CarayonP.WetterneckT. B.Rivera-RodriguezA. J.HundtA. S.HoonakkerP.HoldenR.GursesA. P. (2014). Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 14–25.
5.
CarayonP.XieA.KianfarS. (2014). Human factors and ergonomics as a patient safety practice. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(3), 196–205.
6.
CarayonP.HundtA. S.HoonakkerP. (2019). Technology barriers and strategies in coordinating care for chronically ill patients. Applied Ergonomics, 78, 240-247.
7.
CohenE.BerryJ. G.CamachoX.AndersonG.WodchisW.GuttmannA. (2012). Patterns and costs of health care use of children with medical complexity. Pediatrics, 130(6), e1463-70.
8.
CollerR.J.LernerC.F.EickhoffJ.C.KlitznerT.S.SlankskyD.J.EhlenbachM.ChungP.J. (2016). Medical complexity among children with special health care needs: A two-dimensional view. Health services research, 51(4), 1644-1669.
9.
DebonoD. S.GreenfieldD.BlackD.BraithwaiteJ. (2010). Workarounds: straddling or widening gaps in the safe delivery of healthcare? In Proceedings of 7th international conference in organisational behaviour in health care (OBHC), 1-15.
10.
DoutchevaN.ThomasH.ParksR.CollerR.WernerN. (2019). Homes of children with medical complexity as a complex work system: outcomes associated with interactions in the physical environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 753–757.
11.
HalbeslebenJ. R.WakefieldD. S.WakefieldB. J. (2008). Work-arounds in health care settings: literature review and research agenda. Health care management review, 33(1), 2-12.
12.
HodgkinsonR.LesterH. (2002). Stresses and coping strategies of mothers living with a child with cystic fibrosis: implications for nursing professionals. Journal of advanced nursing, 39(4), 377-383.
13.
HoldenR.J.MickelsonR.S. (2013). Performance barriers among elderly chronic heart failure patients: an application of patient-engaged human factors and ergonomics. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 758-762.
14.
HoldenR.J.CarayonP.GursesA.P.HoonakkerP.HundtA.S.OzokA.A.Rivera-RodriguezA.J. (2013). SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics, 56(11), 1669–1686.
15.
HoldenR.J.SchubertC.C.MickelsonR.S. (2015). The patient work system: an analysis of self-care performance barriers among elderly heart failure patients and their informal caregivers. Applied Ergonomics, 47, 133-150.
16.
HoldenR.J.CornetV.P.ValdezR.S. (2020). Patient ergonomics: 10-year mapping review of patient-centered human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 82, 102972.
17.
HollnagelE.WoodsD.D. (2005). Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York, NY: CRC Press.
18.
HoltzblattK.BeyerH. (2017). Contextual Design: Design for life. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.
19.
JenningsP. (1990). Caring for a child with a tracheostomy. Nursing Standard, 4(30), 24-26.
20.
KarshB-TWeingerM.B.AbbottP.A.WearsR.L. (2010). Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(6), 617-623.
21.
KirkS. (1998). Families experiences of caring at home for a technology-dependent child: a review of the literature. Child: care, health and development, 24(2), 101-14.
22.
MorathJ.TurnbullJ. (2005). To Do No Harm: Ensuring Patient Safety in Health Care Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
National Research Council. (2011). Health Care Comes Home: The Human Factors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24.
NovakL. L.HoldenR. J.AndersS. H.HongJ. Y.KarshB. T. (2013). Using a sociotechnical framework to understand adaptations in health IT implementation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(12), e331–e344.
25.
OrC.K.KarshB-T. (2009). A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(4), 550-560.
26.
OrC.K.KarshB-TSevertsonD.J.BurkeL.J.BrownR.L.BrennanP.F. (2011). Factors affecting home care patients’ acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(1), 51-59.
27.
PonnalaS.BlockL.LinggA.J.KindA.WernerN.E. (2020). Conceputalizing caregiving activities for persons with dementia (PwD) through a patient work lens. Applied Ergonomics, 85, 103070.
28.
UnruhK. T.PrattW. (2008). The Invisible Work of Being a Patient and Implications for Health Care:“[the doctor is] my business partner in the most important business in my life, staying alive.”Proceedings of the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, 2008(1), 40-50.
29.
ValdezR. S.HoldenR. J.NovakL. L.VeinotT. C. (2014). Transforming consumer health informatics through a patient work framework: Connecting patients to context. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 2–10.
30.
ValdezR. S.HoldenR. J.NovakL. L.VeinotT. C. (2015). Technical infrastructure implications of the patient work framework. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(e1), e213–e215.
31.
VogelsmeierA. A.HalbeslebenJ. R. B.Scott-CawiezellJ. R. (2008). Technology Implementation and Workarounds in the Nursing Home. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(1), 114–119.
32.
WangK.W.BarnardA. (2004). Technology-dependent children and their families: a review. Journal of advanced nursing, 45(1), 36-46.
33.
WernerN.E.StanislawskiB.MarxK.A.WatkinsD.C.KobayashiM.KalesH.GitlinL.N. (2017). Getting what they need when they need it. Applied Clinical Informatics, 8(1), 191-205.
34.
WernerN. E.JolliffA. F.CasperG.MartellT.PontoK. (2018). Home is where the head is: a distributed cognition account of personal health information management in the home among those with chronic illness. Ergonomics, 61(8), 1065–1078.
