Investigating the Effects of Demographics and Framing on the Robot-Theater Program

Abstract

While STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) education programs have shown promise in increasing students’ interest in STEM and arts & design fields, the effects of demographic and other contextual factors have not been thoroughly investigated yet. While conducting robot-theater summer youth sessions with forty participants of the TechGirls international summer exchange program, we explored these factors. Participants in teams of four to six students created a script for a theater play that required the use of programmable robots. Results seem to suggest the influence of demographic factors such as nationality, as well as the effect of framing on participant attitudes towards robots and STEAM education. Subsequent validation of these effects in other studies is expected to contribute to refining the design of robot-theater and other STEAM education programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes

FakhrHosseini

S. M.

Vasey

Park

C. H.

Jeon

(2020). Child-Robot Theater: Engaging Elementary Students in Informal STEAM Education Using Robots. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2019.2940181

Bethel

C. L.

Murphy

R. R.

(2008). Survey of Non-facial/Non-verbal Affective Expressions for Appearance-Constrained Robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 38(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905845

de Borst

A. W.

de Gelder

. (2015). Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: An affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(MAY), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00576

Flandorfer

(2012). Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance. International Journal of Population Research, 2012, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/829835

Floreano

Mondada

(1994). Automatic creation of an autonomous agent: Genetic evolution of a neural-network driven robot. From Animals to Animats, (JANUARY), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1.1.51.6256

Hinds

P. J.

Roberts

T. L.

Jones

(2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1–2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_7

Jeon

Fakhrhosseini

Barnes

Duford

Zhang

Ryan

Vasey

(2016). Making live theatre with multiple robots as actors: Bringing robots to rural schools to promote STEAM education for underserved students. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2016-April(March), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451798

Kaboski

J. R.

Diehl

J. J.

Beriont

Crowell

C. R.

Villano

Wier

Tang

(2015). Brief Report: A Pilot Summer Robotics Camp to Reduce Social Anxiety and Improve Social/Vocational Skills in Adolescents with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3862–3869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2153-3

Land

M. H.

(2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. In Procedia Computer Science (vol. 20, pp. 547–552). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317

10.

Michalowski

M. P.

Sabanovic

Kozima

(2007). A dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction. HRI 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - Robot as Team Member, 89– 96. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228729

11.

Reich-Stiebert

Eyssel

(2015). Learning with Educational Companion Robots? Toward Attitudes on Education Robots, Predictors of Attitudes, and Application Potentials for Education Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0308-9

12.

Sartorato

Przybylowski

Sarko

D. K.

(2017). Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: Enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 90, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.004

13.

Wada

Shibata

Saito

Tanie

(2004). Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(11), 1780–1788. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.835378

14.

Zhang

Jeon

Park

C. H.

Howard

(2015). Robotic Sonification for Promoting Emotional and Social Interactions of Children with ASD. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 02-05-Marc, 111–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.270203