Come Closer: Experimental Investigation of Robots’ Appearance on Proximity,Affect and Trust in a Domestic Environment

Abstract

From once being utopian, robots become more and more common in public and private social life. One area of application are robots, which are able to perform chores in domestic environments. To support users accustoming to the new robot companion, psychological mechanisms that enhance the interaction with robots need to be understood. In this research, the effects of robot’s height and manipulator position on proximity, affect and trust with regards to a humanoid robot were investigated in a laboratory experiment. Results indicated an effect of robot’s height on the comfort distance. On the other hand, a habituation effect after a second robot-human approach was found, in which the influence of the robot’s height on proximity diminished. Similar effects with an anxiety decrease and trending trust increase in the tall robot over time emphasize the importance of first encounters, which should be paid special attention to by designers of robotic systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brandl

Mertens

Schlick

C. M.

(2016). Human-robot interaction in assisted personal services: factors influencing distances that humans will accept between themselves and an approaching service robot. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(6), 713-727. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20675

Hall

E. T.

(1966). The hidden dimension. Anchor Books.

Hall

E. T.

(1974). Handbook for proxemic research. Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication.

Ham

van Esch

Limpens

de Pee

Cabibihan

J. J.

S. S.

(2012). The automaticity of social behavior towards robots: The influence of cognitive load on interpersonal distance to approachable versus less approachable robots. In Ge

S. S.

Khatib

Cabibihan

J. J.

Simmons

Williams

M. A.

(Eds.), International conference on social robotics (pp. 15-25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_2

Hancock

P. A.

Billings

D. R.

Schaefer

K. E.

Chen

J. Y.

De Visser

E. J.

Parasuraman

(2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254

Hartnett

J. J.

Bailey

K. G.

Hartley

C. S.

(1974). Body height, position, and sex as determinants of personal space. The Journal of Psychology, 87(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1974.9915683

Hayduk

L. A.

(1978). Personal space: An evaluative and orienting overview. Psychological Bulletin, 85(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.117

Koay

K. L.

Syrdal

D. S.

Walters

M. L.

Dautenhahn

(2007). Living with robots: Investigating the habituation effect in participants’ preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. RO-MAN 2007-The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 16, 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415149

Kraus

J. M.

(2020). Psychological processes in the formation and calibration of trust in automation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ulm University.

10.

Kraus

Scholz

Messner

E.-M.

Messner

Baumann

(2020). Scared to trust? – Predicting trust in highly automated driving by depressiveness, negative self-evaluations and state anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02917

11.

Lang

P. J.

(1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In Sidowski

J. B.

Johnson

J. H.

Williams

T. A.

(Eds.), Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems (pp. 119-l37). Ablex.

12.

Lee

J. D.

(2006). Affect, attention, and automation. In Kramer

A. F.

Wiegmann

Kirlik

(Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 73-89). Oxford University Press.

13.

Lee

J. D.

See

K. A.

(2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80.

14.

Leichtmann

Nitsch

(2020). How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101386

15.

Mead

Matarić

M. J.

(2016). Perceptual models of human-robot proxemics. In Hsieh

Khatib

Kumar

(Eds.), Experimental Robotics (pp. 261-276). Springer.

16.

Miller

Kraus

Babel

Baumann

(2020). Too close to trust – Mediation of state anxiety between user dispositions, trust and distancing behavior in domestic human-robot interaction [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Human Factors, Ulm University.

17.

Mumm

Mutlu

(2011). Human-robot proxemics: physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction. In Billard

Kahn

. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 331-338). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957786

18.

Nomura

Kanda

Suzuki

Kato

(2008). Prediction of human behavior in human-robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(2), 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.914004

19.

Obaid

Sandoval

E. B.

Złotowski

Moltchanova

Basedow

C. A.

Bartneck

(2016). Stop! That is close enough. How body postures influence human-robot proximity. 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 25, pp. 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2016.7745155

20.

Perry

Rubinsten

Peled

Shamay-Tsoory

S. G.

(2013). Don’t stand so close to me: A behavioral and ERP study of preferred interpersonal distance. Neuroimage, 83, 761-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.042

21.

Rios-Martinez

Spalanzani

Laugier

(2015). From proxemics theory to socially-aware navigation: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0251-1

22.

Schwarz

Clore

G. L.

(1988). How do I feel about It? Informative functions of affective states. In Fiedler

Forgas

(Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behaviour (pp. 44-62). Hogrefe.

23.

Sisbot

E. A.

Marin-Urias

L. F.

Alami

Simeon

(2007). A human aware mobile robot motion planner. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 874-883. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.904911

24.

Spielberger

C. D.

(1966). Anxiety and behavior. Academic Press.

25.

Stulp

Buunk

A. P.

Verhulst

Pollet

T. V.

(2015). Human height is positively related to interpersonal dominance in dyadic interactions. PloS One, 10(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117860

26.

Torta

Cuijpers

R. H.

Juola

(2013). Design of a parametric model of personal space for robotic social navigation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0188-9

27.

Tsui

K. M.

Desai

Yanco

H. A.

(2010). Considering the bystander’s perspective for indirect human-robot interaction. 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 5, 129-130. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2010.5453230

28.

van Oosterhout

Visser

. (2008). A visual method for robot proxemics measurements. In Burghart

C. R.

Steinfeld

(Eds.), Proceedings of Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 61-68). University of Hertfordshire.

29.

Walters

M. L.

Dautenhahn

Te Boekhorst

Koay

K. L.

Kaouri

Woods

Nehaniv

Lee

Werry

(2005). The influence of subjects’ personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513803