Using a visual search and decision-making task, we investigated common task switching effects on baggage screeners. Like the general population, baggage screeners perform best when there is no task switching as shown by a high sustained d’ and fast decision time. Although baggage screeners continue to improve throughout the task, task switching results in functional decay of the memory for the current decision-criterion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportA.StylesE. A.HsiehS. (1994). Shifting Intentional Set: Exploring the Dynamic Control of Tasks.
2.
AllportA.WylieG. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set.
3.
AllportA.WylieG. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII, 35–70.
4.
AltmannE. M. (2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 287–297.
5.
AltmannE. M.GrayW. D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science, 13(1), 27–33.
6.
AltmannE. M.GrayW. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115(3), 602.
7.
De JongR. (2000). 15 An Intention-Activation Account of Residual Switch Costs. Control of Cognitive Processes, 357.
8.
De JongR.BerendsenE.CoolsR. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica, 101(2–3), 379–394.
9.
GopherD.ArmonyL.GreenshpanY. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 308.
10.
GopherD.GreenshpanY.ArmonyL. (1996). Switching attention between tasks: Exploration of the components of executive control and their development with training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40, 1060–1064.
11.
LosS. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94(2), 145–188.
12.
MeiranN. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1423.
13.
MeiranN. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 234–249.
14.
MonsellS. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140.
15.
NewellA.RosenbloomP. S.AndersonJ. R. (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition.
16.
RogersR. D.MonsellS. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207.
17.
SteinhauserM.HübnerR. (2006). Response-based strengthening in task shifting: Evidence from shift effects produced by errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 517.
18.
WylieG.AllportA. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.”Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 212–233.
