Cognitive maps, or mental representations of external environments, aid spatial navigation. Typically, researchers study cognitive maps by having participants provide a sketched map. However, multidimensional scaling (MDS) and Pathfinder, statistical techniques which represent a set of input proximities as a n-dimensional space or a network, respectively, can both be used as measures of cognitive maps. Previous research with semantic knowledge suggests that Pathfinder is better than MDS for mental modelling. In the present study, participants drew maps of a familiar environment from memory and provided pairwise distance ratings for landmarks present in those locations. Using those distance ratings as inputs for MDS solutions and Pathfinder networks, the extent to which MDS and Pathfinder related to the participant sketch maps was assessed. Results indicated that MDS solutions were more highly correlated with sketch maps than were Pathfinder networks.
BladesM. (1990). The reliability of data collected from sketch maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(4), 327-339.
3.
ChadwickR.PazuchanicsS. L.GillanD. J. (2006). What the robot’s camera tells the operator’s brain. In CookeN.PringleH.PedersenH.ConnerO. (Eds.). Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research: Human factors of remotely piloted vehicles (pp. 373-384). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4.
ColucciaE.BoscoA.BrandimonteM. A. (2007). The role of visuo-spatial working memory in map learning: New findings from a map drawing paradigm. Psychological Research, 71(3), 359-372.
5.
CookeN. (1992). Predicting Judgment Time from Measures of Psychological Proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 640-653.
6.
CookeN.DursoF.SchvanevedltR. (1986). Recall and Measures of Memory Organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(4), 538-549.
7.
DownsR. M.SteaD. (Eds.). (1973). Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Transaction Publishers.
8.
GillanD. J.BreedinS.CookeN. (1994). Network and multidimensional representations of the declarative knowledge of human-computer interface design experts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 587-615.
9.
GillanD. J. (1994), Cognitive psychophysics and mental models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 256-260.
10.
GillanD. J. (2014). Eye, robot: Visual perception and human-robot interaction. In HoffmanR.HancockP.ScerboM.ParasuramanR. Eds), The Cambridge handbook of applied perceptual research. (pp 830 – 847). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GoldsmithT.JohnsonP.ActonW. (1994) Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88-96.
12.
HowardR. B.ChaseS. D.RothmanM. (1973). An analysis of four measures of cognitive maps. Environmental design research, 1, 254-264.
13.
KitchinRob (1994) Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14. 1-19.
14.
KosslynS.PomerantzJ. R. (1977) Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 52-76.
15.
KosslynS. M.BallT. M.ReiserB. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 47.
16.
KozlowskiL. T.BryantK. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: human perception and performance, 3(4), 590.
17.
KruskalJ. B.WishM. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
LohmannK. (2011). The use of sketch maps as a basis for measures of spatial knowledge. In Understanding and Processing Sketch Maps. In: Proceedings of the COSIT 2011 workshop. AKA Verlag, Heidelberg.
19.
LouwerseM.M.BeneshN. (2012). Representing spatial structure through maps and language: Lord of the Rings encodes the spatial structure of middle earth. Cognitive Science. 36, 1556-1569.
20.
MontelloD. (1991). The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 101-122.
RovineM. J.WeismanG. D. (1989). Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(3), 217-232.
23.
SchvaneveldtR. W.DursoF. T.DearholtD. W. (1989). Network structures in proximity data. In BowerG. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 24 (pp. 249-284). New York: Academic Press.
24.
SiegelA. W.WhiteS. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 10, 9–55.
25.
Steven-AdamsS.M.GoldsmithT.E.ButlerK.M. (2012). Validation of individuals’ semantic networks for common knowledge is associated with false memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 65(6), 1035-1043.
26.
ThorndykeP. W.Hayes-RothB. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology. 14, MCI-589.
27.
TolmanE.C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review55 (4): 189–208.
28.
TorgersonW.S.1952. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika. 17(4), 401-419.
29.
TrobergE.GillanD. J. (2007). Measuring spatial knowledge: Effects of the relation between acquisition and testing. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting. (pp. 368-371). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
