Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of emergency medical service (EMS) fatalities. These crashes have been mainly attributed to driver distraction caused by in-vehicle technologies especially mobile computer terminals (MCTs). This study used cognitive performance modeling to assess MCT use by EMS drivers. A pilot study was conducted with six EMS experts performing a navigation task with the MCT. Pilot data results were used to create and validate the models using CogTool platform. In terms of task completion time (TCT), the model closely matched the data collected through observations, allowing for redesign improvements to be considered, while further validating CogTool as an analytical tool. The MCT was also redesigned based on the usability heuristics. The developed models and approach can be used in MCT design and development process to ensure efficient interaction in multi-tasking situations of driving and using the MCT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbdelwanisN. (2013). “Characteristics and contributing factors of emergency vehicle crashes.”
2.
AgrawalM.RaoH. R.SandersG. L. (2003). Impact of mobile computing terminals in police work. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 13(2), 73-89.
3.
BeanlandV.FitzharrisM.YoungK. L.LennéM. G. (2013). Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: Data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 54, 99-107.
4.
BellamyR.JohnB.RichardsJ.ThomasJ. (2010, October). Using CogTool to model programming tasks. In Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools (p. 1). ACM.
5.
DoormaalM. T. A. J.DriessenA. P. A.LandeweerdJ. A.DrostM. R. (1995). Physical workload of ambulance assistants. Ergonomics, 38(2), 361-376.
6.
El-MasriS.SaddikB. (2012). An emergency system to improve ambulance dispatching, ambulance diversion and clinical handover communication—A proposed model. Journal of medical systems, 36(6), 3917-3923.
HarveyC.StantonN. A. (2016). Usability evaluation for in-vehicle systems. Crc Press.
10.
HsiaoH.ChangJ.SimeonovP. (2018). Preventing emergency vehicle crashes: status and challenges of human factors issues. Human factors, 60(7), 1048-1072.
11.
JohnB. E.PrevasK.SalvucciD. D.KoedingerK. (2004, April). Predictive human performance modeling made easy. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 455-462). ACM.
12.
KunA. L.WachtelJ.MillerW. T.SonP.LavallièreM. (2015, September). User interfaces for first responder vehicles: views from practitioners, industry, and academia. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 163-170). ACM.
13.
LiuZ.DonmezB. (2011). Effects of distractions on injury severity in police-involved crashes. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
14.
MaguireB. J. (2011). Transportation-related injuries and fatalities among Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics. Prehospital and disaster medicine, 26(5), 346-352.
15.
MaguireB.J.HuntingK.L.SmithG.S.LevickN.R. (2002). Occupational fatalities in emergency medical services: a hidden crisis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 40 (6), 625–632.
16.
NielsenJ. (1994, April). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 152-158).
NielsonE. G.FølstadA. (2012). Effectiveness and Efficiency as Conflicting Requirements in Designing Emergency Mission Reporting. In I-UxSED (pp. 20-25).
19.
OlsonJ. R.OlsonG. M. (1995). The growth of cognitive modeling in human-computer interaction since GOMS. In Readings in Human– Computer Interaction (pp. 603-625). Morgan Kaufmann.
20.
PhamJ. C.PatelR.MillinM. G.KirschT. D.ChanmugamA. (2006). The effects of ambulance diversion: a comprehensive review. Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(11), 1220-1227.
21.
RayA. M.KupasD. F. (2007). Comparison of Rural andUrban Ambulance Crashes in Pennsylvania. Prehospital emergency care, 11(4), 416-420.
22.
Santiago-EspadaY.LatorellaK. A. (2013). Predicting Operator Execution Times Using CogTool.
23.
SheridanT. B. (2004). Driver distraction from a control theory perspective. Human factors, 46(4), 587-599.
ZahabiM.KaberD. (2018a). Identification of task demands and usability issues in police use of mobile computing terminals. Applied ergonomics, 66, 161-171.
26.
ZahabiM.KaberD. (2018b). Effect of police mobile computer terminal interface design on officer driving distraction. Applied ergonomics, 67, 26-38.
