Global investments in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are on the rise, with the results to impact global economies, security, safety, and human well-being. The most heralded advances in this space are more often about the technologies that are capable of disrupting business-as-usual than they are about innovation that advances or supports a global workforce. The Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier is one of NSF’s 10 Big Ideas for research advancement. This panel discussion focuses on the barriers and opportunities for a future of human and AI/robot teaming, with people at the center of complex systems that provide social, ethical, and economic value.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnithesE. (2017). The Shape of Work to Come. Nature, 316-319.
2.
BelpaemeT.KennedyRamachandranScassellatiB.TanakaF. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954.
3.
BrynjolfssonE.MitchellT. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
4.
DeCostanzaA. H.MaratheA. R.BohannonA.EvansA. W.PalazzoloE. T.MetcalfeJ. S.McDowellK. (2018). Enhancing Human–Agent Teaming with Individualized, Adaptive Technologies: A Discussion of Critical Scientific Questions. Retreived February24, 2020, from https://brain.ieee.org/brain-storm/enhancing-human-agent-teaming/
5.
DolgovI.KaltenbachE.K.KhalafA. S.ToupsZ. O. (2017). Measuring human performance in the field: Concepts and applications for unmanned aircraft systems. Human Factors in Practice: Concepts and Applications. CRC Press.
GunningD. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) program update November 2017. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA/I20.
10.
HoldenJ.GoelN. (2016). Fast-forwarding to a future of on-demand urban air transportation [White paper]. Retrieved February6, 2020 from Uber Technologies, Inc.: https://www.uber.com/elevate.pdf.
11.
KaltenbachE.K.DolgovI. (2017, September). On the dual nature of transparency and reliability: Rethinking factors that shape trust in automation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 308-312). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
12.
KulikJ. A.FletcherJ. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42-78).
13.
MatarićM. J. (2017). Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation. Science Robotics, 2(4), eaam5410.
14.
MatsudaN.WengW.WallN. (2020. The effect of metacognitive scaffolding for learning by teaching a teachable agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. DOI: 10.1007/s40593-019-00190-2
15.
MichaudF.BoissyP.LabontéD.BrireS.PerreaultK.CorriveauH.… LétourneauD.(2010). Exploratory design and evaluation of a homecare teleassistive mobile robotic system. Mechatronics, 20(7), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.01.010
16.
OECD. (2019). Forty-two countries adopt new OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved December5, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/science/forty-two-countries- adopt-new-oecd-principles-on-artificial-intelligence.htm
17.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT.WickensC. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
18.
ParisC.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084879
RoscoeR. D.SegedyJ. R.SulcerBJeongH.BiswasG. (2013). Shallow strategy development in a teachable agent environment designed to support self-regulated learning. Computers and Education, 62, 286-297.
21.
RoscoeR. D.WilsonJ.JohnsonA. C.MayraC. R. (2017). Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 207- 221.
22.
RoundtreeK. A.GoodrichM. A.AdamsJ. A. (2019). Transparency: Transitioning from human–machine systems to human-swarm systems. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13(3), 171-195.
23.
RummelN.WalkerE.AlevenV. (2016). Different futures of adaptive collaborative learning support. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 784-795.
24.
SalasE.BurkeC.JanisA. (2000). Teamwork: Emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(4), 339–356.
25.
SalasE.DickinsonT. L.ConverseS. A.TannenbaumS. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In SwezeyR.SalasE. (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 3–29). Norwood, NJ.
26.
SalasE.WilsonK.MurphyC.KingH.SalisburyM. (2008). Communicating, coordinating, and cooperating when lives depend on it: Tips for teamwork. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety / Joint Commission Resources, 34(6), 333–341. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18595379
27.
Santoni de SioF.Van den HovenJ. (2018). Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: A philosophical account. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5,15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015
28.
ShermisM. D.BursteinJ. (Eds.) (2013). Handbook of automated essay evaluation. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
SugiharaK.SuzukiI. (1994). Distributed motion coordination of multiple mobile robots. In Proceedings. 5th IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control 1990 (Vol. 3, pp. 138–143). IEEE Comput. Soc. Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIC.1990.128452
30.
SycaraK.ZengD. (1996). Coordination of Multiple Intelligent Software Agents. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 05(02n03), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218843096000087
31.
ThipphavongD. P.ApazaR.BarmoreB.BattisteV.BurianB.DaoQ.… IdrisH. R. (2018). Urban air mobility airspace integration concepts and considerations. In 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. 3676-3694). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3676
32.
ThomazA. L.BreazealC. (2008). Teachable robots: Understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artificial Intelligence, 172, 716-737.
33.
VanLehnK. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.
34.
VascikP. D.HansmanR. J.DunnN. S. (2018). Analysis of urban air mobility operational constraints. Journal of Air Transportation, 26(4), 133-146.
35.
WachterS.MittelstadtB.FloridiL. (2017). Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics. Science Robotics, 2(6), eaan6080.
36.
WilsonJ.RoscoeR. D. (2019). Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87-125.
