Active seating designs may enable users to move more frequently, thereby decreasing physiological risks associated with a sedentary lifestyle. In this preliminary study, two active seating designs (QOR360, Ariel; QOR360, Newton) were compared to a static chair (Herman Miller, Aeron) to understand how active vs. static seating may affect task performance, movement, posture, and perceived discomfort. This within-subjects experiment involved n = 11 student participants who sat upon each of the three chairs for 20 minutes while performing a series of computer-based tasks. Participants showed increased trunk movement while also reporting higher levels of perceived discomfort in the two active chair conditions. There was no significant difference in either posture or fine motor task performance between the active and static conditions. Future research may benefit from additional physiological measurements along with a wider variety of tasks that require seated users to make postural adjustments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BendixT.PoulsenV.KlausenK.JensenC. V. (1996). What does a backrest actually do to the lumbar spine?Ergonomics, 39(4), 533–542.
2.
CascioliV.LiuZ.HeuschA.McCarthyP. W. (2016). A methodology using in-chair movements as an objective measure of discomfort for the purpose of statistically distinguishing between similar seat surfaces. Applied Ergonomics, 54, 100-109.
3.
CommissarisD. A.KönemannR.Hiemstra-van MastrigtS.BurfordE. M.BotterJ.DouwesM.EllegastR. P. (2014). Effects of a standing and three dynamic workstations on computer task performance and cognitive function tests. Applied ergonomics, 45(6), 1570-1578.
4.
Ekblom-BakE.EkblomB.. (2012). Prolonged bout of sitting is metabolic risk factor. Lakartidningen, 109(34), 1467–1470.
5.
EllegastR. P.KraftK.GroenesteijnL.KrauseF.BergerH.VinkP. (2012). Comparison of four specific dynamic office chairs with a conventional office chair: impact upon muscle activation, physical activity and posture. Applied Ergonomics, 43(2), 296-307.
6.
FrymoyerJ. W.Cats-BarilW. L. (1991). An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 22(2), 263–271.
7.
FunkR. E.TaylorM. L.CreekmurC. C.OhlingerC. M.CoxR. H.BergW. P. (2012). Effect of walking speed on typing performance using an active workstation. Perceptual and motor skills, 115(1), 309-318.
8.
GregoryD. E.DunkN. M.CallaghanJ. P. (2006). Stability ball versus office chair: comparison of muscle activation and lumbar spine posture during prolonged sitting. Human Factors, 48(1), 142-153.
9.
GrootenW.J.A.CondradssonD.ÄngB.O.FranzénE. (2013). Is active sitting as active as we think?Ergonomics, 56(8), 1304-1314.
10.
HamaouiA.HassaïneM.ZanoneP. G. (2015). Sitting on a sloping seat does not reduce the strain sustained by the postural chain, PloS one, 10(1), e0116353.
11.
HamiltonM. T.HealyG. N.DunstanD. W.ZdericT. W.OwenN. (2008). Too little exercise and too much sitting: Inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2(4), 292-298. doi:10.1007/s12170-008-0054-8
Hiemstra-van MastrigtS.KampI.Van VeenS. A. T.VinkP.BoschT. (2015). The influence of active seating on car passengers' perceived comfort and activity levels. Applied Ergonomics, 47, 211-219.
14.
JensenC. V.BendixT. (1992). Spontaneous movements with various seated-workplace adjustments. Clinical Biomechanics, 7(2), 87-90.
15.
KarG.HedgeA. (2016, September). Effects of sitting and standing work postures on short-term typing performance and discomfort. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 460-464). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
16.
KatzmarzykP. T.LeeI. (2012). Sedentary behaviour and life expectancy in the USA: a cause-deleted life table analysis. BMJ Open, 12(2): e000828. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000828
17.
KeeganJ. J. (1953). Alterations of the Lumbar Curve Related to Posture and Seating. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 35(3), 589-603.
MummeryW. K.SchofieldG. M.SteeleR.EakinE. G.BrownW. J. (2005). Occupational sitting time and overweight and obesity in Australian workers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.04.003
20.
O'SullivanP.DankaertsW.BurnettA.StrakerL.BargonG.MoloneyN.PerryM.TsangS. (2006). Lumbopelvic kinematics and trunk muscle activity during sitting on stable and unstable surfaces. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 36(1), 19-25.
SøndergaardK. H.OlesenC. G.SøndergaardE. K.De ZeeM.MadeleineP. (2010). The variability and complexity of sitting postural control are associated with discomfort. Journal of Biomechanics, 43(10), 1997-2001.
24.
StubbsB.VancampfortD.FirthJ.SchuchF.B.HallgrenM.SmithLGardnerB.KahlK.G.VeroneseN.SolmiM.CarvalhoA.F.KoyanagiA. (2017). Relationship between sedentary behavior and depression: a mediation analysis of influential factors across the lifespan among 42,469 people in low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Affective Disorders, 229, 231-238.
25.
VergaraM.PageA. (2002). Relationship between comfort and back posture and mobility in sitting-posture. Applied Ergonomics, 33(1), 1-8.
26.
WangH.WeissK. J.HaggertyM. C.HeathJ. E. (2014). The effect of active sitting on trunk motion. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 3(4), 333-337.
