Analysis of Eye Behavior: Mental Workload Assessment in Robotic Surgery Training

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Catchpole

Bisantz

Hallbeck

M. S.

Weigl

Randell

Kossack

Anger

J. T.

(2018). Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies ‘in the Wild.’ Applied Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.011

Di Nocera

Camilli

Terenzi

(2007). A random glance at the flight deck: Pilots’ scanning strategies and the real-time assessment of mental workload. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1, 271–285.

Hung

A. J.

Zehnder

Patil

M. B.

Cai

C. K.

Aron

. . . Desai

M. M.

(2011). Face, Content and Construct Validity of a Novel Robotic Surgery Simulator. The Journal of Urology, 186, 1019–1025.

Lee

G. I.

Lee

M. R.

Clanton

Sutton

Park

A. E.

Marohn

M. R.

(2014). Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 456–465.

Mack

M. J.

(2001). Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 568–572.

Marquart

Cabrall

de Winter

(2015). Review of Eye-related Measures of Drivers’ Mental Workload. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2854–2861.

Zheng

Jiang

Atkins

M. S.

(2015). Detection of Changes in Surgical Difficulty: Evidence From Pupil Responses. Surgical Innovation, 22, 629–635.

Zheng

Jiang

Tien

Meneghetti

Panton

O. N. M.

Atkins

M. S.

(2012). Workload assessment of surgeons: Correlation between NASA TLX and blinks. Surgical Endoscopy, 26, 2746–2750.