Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Previous research on performance on the Fitts pointing task has identified the relative influences of task and effector constraints. Effector constraints are those specific to the motor and physical aspects of the task, such as movement distance, which tend to affect the overall duration of the movement. Task constraints, such as target size, affect the underlying movement dynamic, with effects isolated to the end of the movement, causing asymmetry in the velocity profile. Here, evidence confirming these effects is reported, along with a new task constraint, target size as defined as a physical constraint on final positioning error. A new formulation of Fitts’ law is presented that accounts for all constraints.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berard

Wang

Cooperstock

J.R.

(2011). On the limits of the human motor control precision: The search for a device’s human resolution. In Proceedings of INTERACT’11 (pp. 107-122), Springer-Verlag.

Bohan

McConnell

D.S.

Chaparro

Thompson

S.G.

(2010). The effects of visual magnification and physical movement scale on the manipulation of a tool with indirect vision.

Bohan

Thompson

S.G.

Samuelson

P.J.

(2003). Kinematic analysis of mouse cursor positioning as a function of movement scale and joint set. Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering – Theory, Applications and Practice, Las Vegas, NV.

Bootsma

R.J.

Fernandez

Mottet

(2004). Behind Fitts’ law: Kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(6), 811-821.

Casiez

Vogel

Balakrishnan

Cockburn

(2008). The impact of control-display gain on user performance in pointing tasks. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 23(3), 215-250.

Fernandez

Bootsma

R.J.

(2004). Effects of biomechanical and task constraints on the organization of movement in precision aiming. Experimental Brain Research, 159(4), 458-466.

Fitts

P.M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.

Fitts

P.M.

Peterson

J.R.

(1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103-112.

Geyer

Felske

(2011). Consumer toy or corporate tool: The iPad enters the workplace. Interactions, 18, 45-49.

10.

Guiard

Beaudouin-Lafon

Mottet

(1999). Navigation as multiscale pointing: Extending Fitts’ model to very high precision tasks. In Proceedings of CHI’99 (pp. 450-457), ACM.

11.

Kantowitz

B.H.

Elvers

G.C.

(1988). Fitts’ law with an isometric controller: Effects of order of control and control-display gain. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20(1), 53-66.

12.

Lin

M.L.

Radwin

R.G.

Vanderheiden

G.C.

(1992). Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. Ergonomics, 35(2), 159-175.

13.

Mackenzie

I.S.

(1992). Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 91-139.

14.

Meyer

D.E.

Abrams

R.A.

Kornblum

Wright

C.E.

Smith

J.E.K.

(1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.

15.

Soukoreff

R.W.

MacKenzie

I.S.

(2004). Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(6), 751-789.

16.

Thompson

S.G.

McConnell

D.S.

Slocum

Bohan

(2007). Kinematic analysis of multiple constraints on a pointing task. Human Movement Science, 26, 11-26.

17.

Van Doorn

R.R.A.

Unema

P.J.A.

(2005). Effects of adaptation to altered display gain on the control of single aimed movements. Acta Psychologica, 116, 309-326.

Precision Constraints during Pointing with a Stylus: Implications for Fitts’ Law

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References