ChihakB. J.PlumertJ. M.ZiemerC. J.BabuS.GrechkinT.CremerJ. F.KearneyJ. K. (2010). Synchronizing self and object movement: How child and adult cyclists intercept moving gaps in a virtual environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1535–1552.
2.
CinelliM. E.PatlaA. E.AllardF. (2009). Behaviour and gaze analyses during a goal-directed locomotor task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(3), 483–499.
3.
FajenB. R.MatthisJ. S. (2011). Direct perception of action-scaled affordances: The shrinking gap problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1442–1457.
4.
FranchakJ. M.AdolphK. E. (2014). Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(2), 460–472.
5.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (1st ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
6.
GrechkinT. Y.PlumertJ. M.KearneyJ. K. (2014). Dynamic affordances in embodied interactive systems: The role of display and mode of locomotion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, (4), 596–605.
7.
HiguchiT.CinelliM. E.GreigM. A.PatlaA. E. (2006). Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: adaptation to artificially altered bodily states. Experimental Brain Research, 175(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0525-4
8.
KuznetsovN. B. S.RileyM. (2014). Nonlinear time series methods for analyzing behavioural sequences. In Complex Systems in Sport. London: Routledge.
9.
O’NealE. E.JiangY.FranzenL. J.RahimianP.YonJ. P.KearneyJ. K.PlumertJ. M. (2018). Changes in perception–action tuning over long time scales: How children and adults perceive and act on dynamic affordances when crossing roads. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 18–26.
10.
PlumertJ. M.KearneyJ. K. (2014). How Do Children Perceive and Act on Dynamic Affordances in Crossing Traffic-Filled Roads?Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 207–212.
11.
StrasburgerH. (2001). Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1348–1355. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194547
12.
WagmanJ. B.TaylorK. R. (2005). Perceiving affordances for aperture crossing for the person-plus-object system. Ecological Psychology, 17(2), 105–130.
13.
WalkerI. (2007). Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(2), 417–425.
14.
WarrenW. H.JrWhangS. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 371.
15.
WatsonG.BraultS.KulpaR.BideauB.ButterfieldJ.CraigC. (2011). Judging the ‘passability’ of dynamic gaps in a virtual rugby environment. Human Movement Science, 30(5), 942–956.