Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-11
The Effect of Device (Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy) and Experience (Junior vs. Senior) on Situation Awareness During Simulated Endotracheal Intubation
CaldiroliD.MolteniF.SommarivaA.FrittoliS.GuanziroliE.CortellazziP.OrenaE. (2014). Upper limb muscular activity and perceived workload during laryngoscopy: comparison of Glidescope® and Macintosh laryngoscopy in manikin: an observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 112(3), 563-569
2.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 65-84
3.
EndsleyM. R. (2006). Expertise and Situation Awareness. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 633-652). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
GrundgeigerT.RoewerN.GrundgeigerJ.HurtienneJ.HappelO. (2015). Body posture during simulated tracheal intubation: GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy vs Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for novices and experts. Anaesthesia, 70(12), 1375-1381
5.
WeingerM. B.VredenburghA. G.SchumannC. M.MacarioA.WilliamsK. J.KalsherM. J.. . . KimA. (2000). Quantitative description of the workload associated with airway management procedures. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 12(4), 273-282
6.
WrightM. C.TaekmanJ. M.EndsleyM. R. (2004). Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(suppl 1), i65