The Effect of Device (Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy) and Experience (Junior vs. Senior) on Situation Awareness During Simulated Endotracheal Intubation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2019
The Effect of Device (Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy) and Experience (Junior vs. Senior) on Situation Awareness During Simulated Endotracheal Intubation
CaldiroliD.MolteniF.SommarivaA.FrittoliS.GuanziroliE.CortellazziP.OrenaE. (2014). Upper limb muscular activity and perceived workload during laryngoscopy: comparison of Glidescope® and Macintosh laryngoscopy in manikin: an observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 112(3), 563-569
2.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 65-84
3.
EndsleyM. R. (2006). Expertise and Situation Awareness. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 633-652). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
GrundgeigerT.RoewerN.GrundgeigerJ.HurtienneJ.HappelO. (2015). Body posture during simulated tracheal intubation: GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy vs Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for novices and experts. Anaesthesia, 70(12), 1375-1381
5.
WeingerM. B.VredenburghA. G.SchumannC. M.MacarioA.WilliamsK. J.KalsherM. J.. . . KimA. (2000). Quantitative description of the workload associated with airway management procedures. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 12(4), 273-282
6.
WrightM. C.TaekmanJ. M.EndsleyM. R. (2004). Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(suppl 1), i65
