Abstract
The information purchase bias describes a tendency to opt for information that reduces uncertainty, even when the cost of information is associated with a substantial net reduction in expected value. The current experiment quantified the amount of information that could be purchased in terms of increased certainty of finding a target (a downed aircraft) by purchasing a more expensive, but more powerful sensor. In a “good deal” block, the expected financial gain of finding the target with the upgraded purchase clearly exceeded the cost of the purchase. In a neutral deal block the two terms were equal and in the bad deal block the purchase cost far exceeded the expected gain. The neutral deal was purchased 65% of the time (15% bias); and the bad deal purchased 50% of the time, where the optimal strategy would have been to never purchase. Implications for automation and training are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.