Many challenges associated with aging faced by older drivers may be attenuated by advancements of in-vehicle technologies. One class in particular, In Vehicle Information Systems (IVIS), refers to a collection of features and functions that allow motorists to complete tasks in addition to operating the vehicle. Little is known about how interactions with IVIS may impact older drivers. This study explored comments provided by drivers while completing goal-oriented IVIS tasks in six vehicles; collected via survey, and in an open-ended prompt. Two age cohorts were evaluated: younger drivers between 21-36 years of age, and older drivers between 55-75 years of age. Analyses of comments investigated differences in the thematic content and emotional valence present in comments. Results indicated that older and younger drivers were surprisingly symmetrical in their responses pertaining to valence and themes, and older drivers were more willing to take time to become familiar with IVIS.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertG.LotanT.WeissP.ShiftanY. (2018). The challenge of safe driving among elderly drivers. Healthcare Technology Letters,5(1), 45-48. doi:10.1049/htl.2017.0002
2.
AnsteyK. J.WoodJ.LordS.WalkerJ. G.(2005). Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2545–65. 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.008 [PubMed]
3.
BédardM.LeonardE.McauliffeJ.WeaverB.GibbonsC.DuboisS. (2006). Visual Attention and Older Drivers: The Contribution of Inhibition of Return to Safe Driving. Experimental Aging Research,32(2), 119-135. doi:10.1080/03610730500511918
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
5.
BrouwerW. H.WaterinkW.WolffelaarP. C.RothengatterT. (1991). Divided Attention in Experienced Young and Older Drivers: Lane Tracking and Visual Analysis in a Dynamic Driving Simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,33(5), 573-582. doi:10.1177/001872089103300508
6.
ChanC. Y. (2017). Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. International journal of transportation science and technology, 6(3), 208-216.
7.
ClappW. C.RubensM. T.SabharwalJ.GazzaleyA. (2011). Deficit in switching between functional brain networks underlies the impact of multitasking on working memory in older adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(17), 7212-7.
8.
CroweM.InderM.PorterR. (2015). Conducting qualitative research in mental health: Thematic and content analyses. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(7), 616-623.
9.
CzajaSara J; The Potential Role of Technology in Supporting Older Adults, Public Policy & Aging Report, Volume 27, Issue 2, 1May2017, Pages 44–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prx006
10.
DavisJ. J.ConlonE. G. (2017). Identifying compensatory driving behavior among older adults using the situational avoidance questionnaire. Journal of Safety Research,63, 47-55. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.009
11.
EbyD. W.MolnarL. J.ZhangL.LouisR. M. S.ZanierN.KostyniukL. P.StanciuS. (2016). Use, perceptions, and benefits of automotive technologies among aging drivers. Injury epidemiology, 3(1), 28.
12.
FarageM. A.MillerK. W.AjayiF.HutchinsD. (2012). Design principles to accommodate older adults. Global journal of health science, FiskA. D.RogersW. A.CharnessN.CzajaS. J.SharitJ. (2009). Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420080681
13.
GliskyEL.Changes in Cognitive Function in Human Aging. In:
RiddleDR, editor. Brain Aging: Models, Methods, and Mechanisms. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2007.
JennessJ. W.LernerN. D.MazorS.OsbergJ. S.TefftB. C. (2008). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by young and older early adopters. Survey Results on Adaptive Cruise Control Systems. RN 810, 917.
16.
KarlaftisM. G.KotzampassakisI.KanellaidisG. (2003). An empirical investigation of European drivers’ self-assessment. Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington,D.C National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (2018). Automated Driving Systems: A Vision for Safety. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents
17.
McKnightA. James. “Too Old to Drive?” Issues in Science and Technology (2001).
18.
MusselwhiteB.ACharles & HaddadHebba. (2010). Exploring older drivers’ perceptions of driving. European Journal of Ageing. 7. 181-188. 10.1007/s10433-010-0147-3.
19.
NielsenJ.MolichR. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5April), 249-256.
20.
PettigrewS.CroninS.L.NormanR. (2018). Brief Report: The Unrealized Potential of Autonomous Vehicles for an Aging Population, Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 1-11
21.
MorrisNichole L.CraigCurtisLibbyDavidCooperJennifer. (2018). Older Driver Support System (ODSS) Usability and Design Investigation. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/194496.
22.
SalviaE.PetitC.ChampelyS.ChometteR.Di RienzoF.ColletC. (2016). Effects of Age and Task Load on Drivers' Response Accuracy and Reaction Time When Responding to Traffic Lights. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 8, 169. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00169
23.
StrayerD. L.DrewF. A. (2004). Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers. Human Factors, 46(4), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.640.56806
24.
StrayerD. L.CooperJ. M.TurrillJ.ColemanJ. R.HopmanR. J. (). Talking to your car can drive you to distraction. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 1(1), 16. doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0018-3
25.
VaportzisE.ClausenM. G.GowA. J. (2017). Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1687.
26.
YannisC.AntoniouA.M.ASCEVardakiS.Ph.D.KanellaidisG.M.ASCE. Older Drivers’ Perception and Acceptance of In-Vehicle Devices for Traffic Safety and Traffic Efficiency
