Exploring Sex Differences in Vigilance Performance with Knowledge of Results

Abstract

Vigilance, also referred to as sustained attention, is the ability to maintain attention for extended periods of time while monitoring for, oftentimes, critical signals. In attempt to aid performance decrements in vigilance tasks, previous research has examined the effects of knowledge of results (KR). In essence, KR provides feedback on performance, and is argued to enhance the understanding of task structure and motivation to complete the task successfully. However, relatively little is known about how individual differences, such as observer sex, influence KR effects in vigilance. In the present study, 73 observers completed a 25-minute vigilance task in which they were required to monitor flight paths. Observers were randomly assigned to either a KR condition, in which feedback was given for correct detections, false alarms, and misses, or a control condition, where no feedback was provided. The results indicated that small sex differences were found for correct detections and false alarms, as a function of KR.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berch

D. B.

Kanter

D. R.

(1984). Individual differences. Sustained attention in human performance, 143-178.

Chinn

R. M.

Alluisi

E. A.

(1964). Effect of three kinds of knowledge-of-results information on three measures of vigilance performance. Perceptual and motor skills, 18(3), 901-912.

Colquhoun

W. P.

(1966). Training for vigilance: A comparison of different techniques. Human factors, 8(1), 7-12.

Davies

D.R.

Parasuraman

(1982). The psychology of vigilance. London, UK: Academic.

Dember

W. N.

Galinsky

T. L.

Warm

J. S.

(1992). The role of choice in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(3), 201-204.

Dittmar

M. L.

Warm

J. S.

Dember

W. N.

(1985). Effects of knowledge of results on performance in successive and simultaneous vigilance tasks: A signal detection analysis. In Eberts

R. E.

Eberts

C. G.

(Eds.), Trends in ergonomics/human factors II (pp. 195–202). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Dittmar

M. L.

Warm

J. S.

Dember

W. N.

Ricks

D. F.

(1993). Sex differences in vigilance performance and perceived workload. The Journal of general psychology, 120(3), 309-322.

Esterman

Grosso

Liu

Mitko

Morris

DeGutis

(2016). Anticipation of monetary reward can attenuate the vigilance decrement. PloS one, 11(7), e0159741.

Fraulini

N. W.

Hancock

G. M.

Neigel

A. R.

Claypoole

V. L.

Szalma

J. L.

(2017). A critical examination of the research and theoretical underpinnings discussed in Thomson, Besner, and Smilek (2016). Psychological Review, 124(4), 525-531.

10.

Helton

W. S.

Russell

P. N.

(2017). Rest is still best: The role of the qualitative and quantitative load of interruptions on vigilance. Human factors, 59(1), 91-100.

11.

Hitchcock

E.M.

Dember

W.N.

Warm

J.S.

Moroney

B.W.

See

J.E.

(1999). Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention. Human Factors, 41, 365–372.

12.

Hitchcock

E.M.

Warm

J.S.

Matthews

Dember

W.N.

Shear

P.K.

Tripp

L.D.

Mayleban

D.W.

Parasuraman

(2003). Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 89-112.

13.

Hyde

J. S.

Linn

M. C.

(1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 104(1), 53.

14.

Jerison

H.J.

(1970). Vigilance, discrimination and attention. In Mostofsky

D.I.

(ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 127-147). New York, NY: Appleton.

15.

Koelega

H. S.

Brinkman

J. A.

(1986). Noise and vigilance: An evaluative review. Human Factors, 28(4), 465-481.

16.

Macmillan

N. A.

Creelman

C. D.

(2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17.

Mackworth

N.H.

(1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(1), 6-21.

18.

Mackworth

N.H.

(1950). Researches on the measurement of human performance. Medical Research Council Special Report No. 268. London: H.M. Stationary Office.

19.

Meyers

J. L.

Well

Lorch

R. F.

(2010). Research design and statistical analysis. Routledge.

20.

Neigel

A. R.

Dever

D. A.

Claypoole

V. L.

Fraulini

N. W.

Hancock

G. M.

Szalma

J. L.

(2018, September). Sex Differences in Lexical Vigilance Performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 731-735). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

21.

Parasuraman

Warm

J.S.

Dember

W.N.

(1987). Vigilance: Taxonomy and utility. In Mark

L.S.

Warm

J.S.

Huston

R.I.

(eds.), Ergonomics and Human Factors (pp. 11-32). New York, NY: Springer.

22.

Prinzel

L. J.

III Freeman

F. G

. (1997). Task-specific sex differences in vigilance performance: subjective workload and boredom. Perceptual and motor skills, 85(3_suppl), 1195-1202.

23.

Salmoni

A.W.

Schmidt

R.A.

Walter

C.B.

(1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.

24.

See

J.E.

Howe

S.R.

Warm

J.S.

Dember

W.N.

(1995). Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (2), 230-249.

25.

Shaw

T. H.

Parasuraman

Sikdar

Warm

(2009). Knowledge of results and signal salience modify vigilance performance and cerebral hemovelocity. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53. SAGE Publications.

26.

Siraj

(2007). Event rate as a moderator variable in vigilance: Implications for performance-feedback and stress (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.

27.

Szalma

J. L.

Hancock

P. A.

Dember

W. N.

Warm

J. S.

(2006). Training for vigilance: The effect of knowledge of result format and dispositional optimism and pessimism on performance and stress. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 115-135.

28.

Szalma

J. L.

Miller

L. C.

Hitchcock

E. M.

Warm

J. S.

Dember

W. N.

(1999). Intraclass and Interclass Transfer of Training for Vigilance. In Scerbo

M. W.

Mouloua

(Eds.), Automation Technology and Human Performance: Current Research and Trends (183-187). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

29.

Teo

G. W.

Schmidt

T. N.

Szalma

J. L.

Hancock

G. M.

Hancock

P. A.

(2012). The effect of knowledge of result for training vigilance in a video game-based environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56. SAGE Publications.

30.

Tolin

Fisher

P. G.

(1974). Sex differences and effects of irrelevant auditory stimulation on performance of a visual vigilance task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39(3), 1255-1262.

31.

Warm

J. S.

(1977). Psychological processes in sustained attention. In Vigilance (pp. 623-644). Boston, MA: Springer.

32.

Warm

J. S.

(Ed.). (1984). Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 15-59). New York: Wiley.

33.

Warm

J.S.

Dember

W.N.

(1998). Tests of vigilance taxonomy. In Hoffman

R.R.

Sherrick

M.F.

Warm

J.S.

(eds.), Viewing Psychology as a Whole: The Integrative Science of William N. Dember (pp. 87-112). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.