Procedures play a vital role in high-risk systems in ensuring that the required level of system performance is achieved while maintaining the associated risks below an acceptable level. An effective procedure has a low level of task complexities i.e., elements contributing to a multiplicity of paths/outcomes, uncertainty in information, interdependency, a multiplicity of instructions/object of instructions and an excess amount of information. As a part of this study, we have developed a Natural Language Processing algorithm that can identify these elements in a procedure. The algorithm was tested for a dataset consisting of 20 procedures and the results were found to be promising.
BullemerP. (2014). Understanding Process Safety Challenges associated with Heater Operations in the Process Industry. In Mary K O’Conner Process Safety Center 17th Annual International Symposium.
3.
CampbellD. J. (1991). Goal Levels, Complex Tasks, and Strategy Development: A Review and Analysis. Human Performance, 4(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0401_1
4.
ChanS. H.SongQ.YaoL. J. (2015). The moderating roles of subjective (perceived) and objective task complexity in system use and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(PA), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.059
5.
ChokorA.NaganathanH.ChongW. K.AsmarM. El. (2016). Analyzing Arizona OSHA Injury Reports Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1588–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.200
6.
KannanP.QuddusN.PeresS. C.MannanM. S. (2018). Can We Simplify Complexity Measurement ? a Primer Towards Usable Framework for Industry Implementation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 853–857.
7.
MaynardD. C.HakelM. D. (1997). Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human Performance, 10(4), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1004_1
ParkJ.JungW. (2015). Identifying objective criterion to determine a complicated task - A comparative study. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 85, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.05.012
10.
PenningtonJ.SocherR.ManningC. (2014). Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162
11.
Python Software Foundation. (2016). Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, version 3.6.
12.
RobinsonS. (2018). Multi-Label Classification of Contributing Causal Factors in Self-Reported Safety Narratives. Safety, 4(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4030030
13.
TanH. T.NgT. B. P.MakB. W. Y. (2002). The effects of task complexity on auditors’ performance: The impact of accountability and knowledge. Auditing, 21(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.2.81
14.
TopiH.ValacichJ. S.HofferJ. A. (2005). The effects of task complexity and time availability limitations on human performance in database query tasks. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 62(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.10.003
U.S. EPA. (2012). Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures ( SOPs ). United States Environmental Protection Agency, (April), 1–55. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/QUALITY/qs-docs/g6-final.pdf
