Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-11
Accident analysis in practice: A review of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) applications in the peer reviewed academic literature
The Human Factors Analysis & Classification System (HFACS) is arguably the most popular accident analysis method within Human Factors and Ergonomics. This literature review examines and reports on peer reviewed studies that have applied HFACS to analyse and understand the cause of accidents in a diverse set of domains. Four databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for articles published up to the date 31 July 2018. A total of 43 HFACS studies were included. The most popular accident contexts were aviation, maritime, and rail. A greater number of contributory factors were found at the lower end of the sociotechnical systems analyzed, including the human operator and operating environment levels. Notably, more than 60% of the studies used HFACS in a modified form to analyse how a network of interacting latent and active factors contributed to the occurrence of an accident.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkhtarM.J.UtneI.B.2014. Human fatigue's effect on the risk of maritime groundings - A Bayesian Network modeling approach. Safety Science62:427-440. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.002.
2.
AkyuzE.2017. A marine accident analyzing model to evaluate potential operational causes in cargo ships. Safety Science92:17-25. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.09.010.
3.
AkyuzE.CelikM.2014. Utilization of cognitive map in modelling human error in marine accident analysis and prevention. Safety Science70:19-28. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.004.
4.
BataldenB.M.SydnesA.K.2014. Maritime safety and the ISM code: A study of investigated casualties and incidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs13 (1):3-25. doi:10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8.
5.
BaysariM.T.CaponecchiaC.McIntoshA.S.WilsonJ.R.2009. Classification of errors contributing to rail incidents and accidents: A comparison of two human error identification techniques. Safety Science47 (7):948-957. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.09.012.
6.
BaysariM.T.McIntoshA.S.WilsonJ.R.2008. Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia. Accident Analysis and Prevention40 (5):1750-1757. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.013.
7.
CelikM.CebiS.2009. Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention41 (1):66-75. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.09.004.
8.
DambierM.HinkelbeinJ.2006. Analysis of 2004 German general aviation aircraft accidents according to the HFACS model. Air Medical Journal25 (6):265-269. doi:10.1016/j.amj.2006.03.003.
9.
DaramolaA.Y.2014. An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework. Journal of Air Transport Management35:39-50. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.11.004.
10.
FuG.CaoJ.L.ZhouL.XiangY.C.2017. Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models. Petroleum Science14 (3):570-578. doi:10.1007/s12182-017-0171-4.
11.
GaurD.2005. Human factors analysis and classification system applied to civil aircraft accidents in India. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine76 (5):501-505.
12.
GibbR.W.OlsonW.2008. Classification of Air Force aviation accidents: Mishap trends and prevention. International Journal of Aviation Psychology18 (4):305-325. doi:10.1080/10508410802346913.
13.
GongL.ZhangS.TangP.LuY.2014. An integrated graphic-taxonomic-associative approach to analyze human factors in aviation accidents. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics27 (2):226-240. doi:10.1016/j.cja.2014.02.002.
14.
HaleA.WalkerD.WaltersN.BoltH.2012. Developing the understanding of underlying causes of construction fatal accidents. Safety Science50 (10):2020-2027. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.018.
15.
HooperB.J.O’HareD.P.A.2013. Exploring human error in military aviation flight safety events using post-incident classification systems. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine84 (8):803-813. doi:10.3357/ASEM.3176.2013.
16.
HulmeA.StantonN.A.WalkerG.H.WatersonP.SalmonP.M.2019. What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018. Safety Science117:164-183.
17.
KimS.K.LeeY.H.JangT.I.OhY.J.ShinK.H.2014. An investigation on unintended reactor trip events in terms of human error hazards of Korean nuclear power plants. Annals of Nuclear Energy65:223-231. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.009.
18.
LenneM.G.AshbyK.FitzharrisM.2008. Analysis of general aviation crashes in Australia using the human factors analysis and classification system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology18 (4):340-352. doi:10.1080/10508410802346939.
19.
LenneM.G.SalmonP.M.LiuC.C.TrotterM.2012. A systems approach to accident causation in mining: An application of the HFACS method. Accident Analysis and Prevention48:111-117. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.026.
20.
LevesonN.G.2004. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science42 (4):237-270.
21.
LiW.C.HarrisD.2006. Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine77 (10):1056-1061.
22.
LiW.C.HarrisD.YuC.S.2008. Routes to failure: Analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system. Accident Analysis and Prevention40 (2):426-434. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.011.
23.
LiW.C.HarrisD.2013. Identifying training deficiencies in military pilots by applying the human factors analysis and classification system. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics19 (1):3-18. doi:10.1080/10803548.2013.11076962.
24.
MadiganR.GolightlyD.MaddersR.2016. Application of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to UK rail safety of the line incidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention97:122-131. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.023.
25.
Mirzaei AliabadiM.AghaeiM.H.KalatpourO.SoltanianA.R.NikraveshA.2018. Analysis of human and organizational factors that influence mining accidents based on Bayesian network. InternationalJournal of Occupational Safety in Ergonomics1-8. doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1455411.
26.
PattersonJ.M.ShappellS.A.2010. Operator error and system deficiencies: Analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. Accident Analysis and Prevention42 (4):1379-1385. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.018.
27.
RasmussenJ.1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science27 (2/3):183-213. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0.
28.
ReasonJ.1990. Human error. New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
29.
ReinachS.VialeA.2006. Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. Accident Analysis and Prevention38 (2):396-406. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.013.
30.
ShappellS.DetwilerC.HolcombK.HackworthC.BoquetA.WiegmannD.A.2007. Human error and commercial aviation accidents: An analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. Human Factors49 (2):227-242. doi:10.1518/001872007X312469.
31.
ShappellS.A.WiegmannD.A.2001. Applying reason: The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Human Factors and Aerospace Safety1 (1):59-86.
32.
TheophilusS.C.EsenowoV.N.ArewaA.O.IfelebueguA.O.NnadiE.O.MbanasoF.U.2017. Human factors analysis and classification system for the oil and gas industry (HFACS-OGI). Reliability Engineering and System Safety167:168-176. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.036.
33.
TvaryanasA.P.ThompsonW.T.2008. Recurrent error pathways in HFACS data: Analysis of 95 mishaps with remotely piloted aircraft. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine79 (5):525-532. doi:10.3357/ASEM.2002.2008.
34.
TvaryanasA.P.ThompsonW.T.ConstableS.H.2006. Human factors in remotely piloted aircraft operations: HFACS analysis of 221 mishaps over 10 years. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine77 (7):724-732.
35.
VermaS.ChaudhariS.2017. Safety of Workers in Indian Mines: Study, Analysis, and Prediction. Safety and Health at Work8 (3):267-275. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.01.001.
36.
WangY.F.RoohiS.F.HuX.M.XieM.2011. Investigations of Human and Organizational Factors in hazardous vapor accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 191 (1-3):69-82. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.040.
37.
WangY.F.XieM.ChinK.FuX.J.2013. Accident analysis model based on Bayesian Network and Evidential Reasoning approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries26 (1):10-21. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2012.08.001.
38.
WiegmannD.A.ShappellS.A.2001. Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: Application of the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine72 (11):1006-1016.
39.
WongL.WangY.LawT.LoC.T.2016. Association of Root Causes in Fatal Fall-from-Height Construction Accidents in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management142 (7). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001098.
40.
YıldırımU.BaşarE.UğurluO.2017. Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods. Safety Science doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.022.
41.
YoonY.S.HamD.H.YoonW.C.2017. A new approach to analyzing human-related accidents by combined use of HFACS and activity theory-based method. Cognition, Technology and Work19 (4):759-783. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0433-3.
42.
YunxiaoF.YangkeG.2014. Causal factor analysis of Chinese coal mining accident based on HFACS frame. Disaster Advances7 (4):19-26.
43.
ZhanQ.ZhengW.ZhaoB.2017. A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs). Safety Science91:232-250. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.017.
44.
ZhangY.JingL.BaiQ.LiuT.FengY.2018. A systems approach to extraordinarily major coal mine accidents in China from 1997 to 2011: an application of the HFACS approach. International Journal of Occupational Safety in Ergonomics1-13. doi:10.1080/10803548.2017.1415404.
45.
ZhouJ.LeiY.2017. Paths between latent and active errors: Analysis of 407 railway accidents/incidents’ causes in China. Safety Science doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.027.
