Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: To use agent-based modeling to examine how peer influence in a social network affects behavior change among teenage drivers. Background: Teenagers are involved in more fatal driving crashes than any other age group. A solution to the problem is to utilize both feedback systems and online social networks to promote safe driving behavior. Methods: Using a combination of intention (from the Theory of Planned Behavior) and habit, agent-based modeling was used to predict the spread of safe driving behavior through an online social network after the implementation of a feedback system Results: The initial conditions of the social network (e.g., the number of agents to initially engage in safe driving behavior and the number of opinion leaders who use the feedback system), as well as the threshold used to determine intention drive safely had a significant effect on the final number of agents to engage in safe driving behavior. Conclusion: Agent-based modeling suggests that leveraging the power of feedback systems and social networks can lead to a positive change in teenage driving behavior. Application: Agent-based modeling can be a viable tool in predicting teenage driver behavior given the correct choice of parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarts

Verplanken

van Knippenberg

(1998). Predicting Behavior From Actions in the Past: Repeated Decision Making or a Matter of Habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355-1374.

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Ajzen

(2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.

Allison

M. R.

(2001). The Peer Group as a Context for the Development of Young Adolescent Motivation and Achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135-1150.

Bandura

(1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bass

F. M.

(1969). A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215-227.

Bonabeau

(2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(Suppl 3), 7280-7287.

Brown

B. B.

Bakken

J. P.

Ameringer

S. W.

Mahon

S. D.

(2008). A Comprehensive Conceptualization of the Peer Influence Process in Adolescence. In Prinstein

M. J.

Dodge

K. A.

(Eds.), From Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.

Brown

B. B.

Clasen

D. R.

Eicher

S. A.

(1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 521-530.

10.

Carney

McGehee

D. V.

Lee

J. D.

Reyes

M. L.

Raby

(2010). Using an Event-Triggered Video Intervention System to Expand the Supervised Learning of Newly Licensed Adolescent Drivers. [Article]. American Journal of Public Health, 100(6), 1101-1106.

11.

Chen

C.-S.

(2011). Numbers and Types of Public Elementary and Secondary Schools From the Common Core of Data: School Year 2009–10. (NCES 2011-345). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

12.

Compton

R. P.

Ellison-Potter

(2008). Teen Driver Crashes: A Report to Congress Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

13.

Cooper

J. M.

Vladisavljevic

Medeiros-Ward

Martin

P. T.

Strayer

D. L.

(2009). An Investigation of Driver Distraction Near the Tipping Point of Traffic Flow Stability. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51(2), 261-268.

14.

Curtin

(2011). lmSupport: Support for Linear Models. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmSupport

15.

Delre

S. A.

Jager

Bijmolt

T. H. A.

Janssen

M. A.

(2007). Targeting and timing promotional activities: An agent-based model for the takeoff of new products. Journal of Business Research, 60(8), 826-835.

16.

Donmez

Boyle

L. N.

Lee

J. D.

(2007). Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(3), 581-590.

17.

Donmez

Boyle

L. N.

Lee

J. D.

(2008). Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 776-786.

18.

Grimm

Berger

Bastiansen

Eliassen

Ginot

Giske

…DeAngelis

D. L.

(2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1-2), 115-126.

19.

Lally

van Jaarsveld

C. H. M.

Potts

H. W. W.

Wardle

(2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009.

20.

Ludwig

T. D.

Biggs

Wagner

Geller

E. S.

(2002). Using Public Feedback and Competitive Rewards to Increase the Safe Driving of Pizza Deliverers. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(4), 75 - 104.

21.

Macal

C. M.

North

M. J.

(2010). Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4, 151-162.

22.

Macy

M. W.

Willer

(2002). From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143-166.

23.

Madden

Lenhart

(2009). Teens and Distracted Driving. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

24.

Malenfant

Wells

J. K.

Van Houten

Williams

A. F.

(1996). The use of feedback signs to increase observed daytime seat belt use in two cities in North Carolina. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28(6), 771-777.

25.

Maxwell

K. A.

(2002). Friends: The Role of Peer Influence Across Adolescent Risk Behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 267-277.

26.

Mislove

Marcon

Gummadi

K. P.

Druschel

Bhattacharjee

(2007). Measurement and analysis of online social networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, San Diego, California, USA.

27.

Neighbors

Larimer

M. E.

Lewis

M. A.

(2004). Targeting Misperceptions of Descriptive Drinking Norms: Efficacy of a Computer-Delivered Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 434-447.

28.

Panzarasa

Opsahl

Carley

K. M.

(2009). Patterns and dynamics of users’ behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 911-932.

29.

R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 2.13.1). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/

30.

Reason

Manstead

Stradling

Baxter

Campbell

(1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315-1332.

31.

Rogers

E. M.

(2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

32.

Romer

Hornik

(1992). HIV education for youth: The importance of social consensus in behaviour change. AIDS Care, 4(3), 285-285.

33.

Schwarz

Ernst

(2009). Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 497-511.

34.

Shinar

Schechtman

(2002). Headway Feedback Improves Intervehicular Distance: A Field Study. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(3), 474-481.

35.

Shope

J. T.

Bingham

C. R.

(2008). Teen Driving: Motor-Vehicle Crashes and Factors That Contribute. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(3, Supplement 1), S261-S271.

36.

Shope

J. T.

Molnar

L. J.

(2003). Graduated driver licensing in the United States: evaluation results from the early programs. Journal of Safety Research, 34(1), 63-69.

37.

Stonedahl

Wilensky

(2008). NetLogo Virus on a Network model. Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/VirusonaNetwork

38.

Thiele

J. C.

Kurth

Grimm

(2012). RNetLogo: an R package for running and exploring individual-based models implemented in NetLogo. Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

39.

van Eck

P. S.

Jager

Leeflang

P. S. H.

(2011). Opinion Leaders’ Role in Innovation Diffusion: A Simulation Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 187-203.

40.

Van Houten

Nau

P. A.

(1983). Feedback Interventions and Driving Speed: A Parametric and Comparitive Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(3), 253-281.

41.

Verplanken

Aarts

Knippenberg

A. v.

Moonen

(1998). Habit versus planned behavior: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111-128.

42.

Wickham

(2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.

43.

Wilensky

(1999). NetLogo (Version 4.1.3). Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

44.

Wilensky

(2005a). NetLogo Preferential Attachment model. Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/PreferentialAttachment

45.

Wilensky

(2005b). NetLogo Small Worlds model. Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/SmallWorlds

Using Agent-Based Modeling to Predict the Diffusion of Safe Teenage Driving Behavior Through an Online Social Network

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References