Adaptive automation (AA) has been proposed as a solution for problems associated with using static automation. Despite the potential benefits of AA systems, several limitations impede the construction of an effective operational AA system. Hence, the goal of the present paper is to provide general guidelines for constructing an AA system while addressing some of the associated design issues. Recommendations for future studies are presented, where the focus should be on accurate detection of dramatic transitions between Operator Functional States (OFSs) and possibly its precursor, if it exists, and build AA system based on what we are actually capable of clearly identifying.
FreemanF. G.MikulkaP. J.PrinzelL. J.ScerboM. W. (1999). Evaluation of an adaptive automation system using three EEG indices with a visual tracking task. Biological Psychology, 50, 61-76.
3.
HaarmannA.BoucseinW.SchaeferF. (2009). Combining electrodermal responses and cardiovascular measures for probing adaptive automation during simulated flight. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 1026-1040.
4.
HancockP. A.ParasuramanR. (1992). Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems (IVHS). Journal of Safety Research, 23, 181-198.
HancockP. A.ScallenS. F. (1998). Allocating functions in human-machine systems. In HoffmanR.SherrickM. F.WarmJ. S. (Eds.), Viewing Psychology as a Whole (pp. 509-540). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
7.
HilburnB.JornaP. G.ByrneE. A.ParasuramanR. (1997). The effect of adaptive air traffic control (ATC) decision aiding on controller mental workload. In MoulouaM.KoonceJ. (Eds.), Human-Automation Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
HockeyG. R. J. (1986). 19: A state control theory of adaptation and individual differences in stress management. Energetics and Human Information Processing, 31, 285.
9.
InagakiT. (2003). Adaptive automation: Sharing and trading of control. In HollnagelE. (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Task Design (pp. 147-169). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Pub.
10.
KaberD. B.EndsleyM. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 113-153.
11.
KaberD. B.PerryC. M.SegallN.McClernonC. K.PrinzelL. J. (2006). Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 447-462.
12.
LaguA. V.LandryS. J. (2011). Roadmap for the next generation of dynamic function allocation theories and strategies. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21, 14-28.
13.
LinY. P.WangC. H.JungT. P.WuT. L.JengS. K.DuannJ. R.ChenJ. H. (2010). EEG-based emotion recognition in music listening. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 57, 1798-1806.
14.
MikulkaP. J.ScerboM. W.FreemanF. G. (2002). Effects of a biocybernetic system on vigilance performance. Human Factors, 44, 654-664.
15.
ParasuramanR.BahriT.DeatonJ. E.MorrisonJ. G.BarnesM. (1992). Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems. (Tech. Rep. No. NAWCADWAR-92033-60).
16.
ParasuramanR.CosenzoK. A.De VisserE. (2009). Adaptive automation for human supervision of multiple uninhabited vehicles: Effects on change detection, situation awareness, and mental workload. Military Psychology, 21, 270-297.
17.
ParasuramanR.MoulouaM.MolloyR. (1996). Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38, 665-679.
18.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
19.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT.WickensC. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286–297.
20.
PrinzelL. J.FreemanF. G.ScerboM. W.MikulkaP. J.PopeA. T. (2003). Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload, and the event-related potential P300 component. Human Factors, 45, 601-614.
21.
RouseW. B. (1988). Adaptive aiding for human/computer control. Human Factors, 30, 431-443.
22.
SarterN.WoodsD. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, 5–19.
23.
SauerJ.KaoC. S.WastellD.NickelP. (2011). Explicit control of adaptive automation under different levels of environmental stress. Ergonomics, 54, 755-766.
24.
ScerboM. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 37–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
SheridanT. B.VerplanckW. L. (1978). Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators. Tech. Rep., MIT Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.
26.
WilsonG. F.CaldwellJ. A.RussellC. A. (2007). Performance and psychophysiological measures wof fatigue effects on aviation related tasks of varying difficulty. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 17, 219-247.
27.
WilsonG. F.RussellC. A. (2003). Operator functional state classification using multiple sychophysiological features in an air traffic control task. Human Factors, 45, 381-389.
28.
WilsonG. F.RussellC. A. (2007). Performance enhancement in an uninhabited air vehicle task using psychophysiologically determined adaptive aiding. Human Factors, 49, 1005-1018.
