Reliability of a Cued Combat Identification Aid on Soldier Performance and Trust

Abstract

Personal combat identification (CID) aids have been developed to assist Soldiers in the appropriate allocation of lethal force. Because of the dynamic nature of the battlefield, CID aids may be situationally unreliable. The purpose of the current study was to explore the effects of varying the reliability levels of CID aids on Soldier performance using a simulated marksmanship trainer. Twelve Army ROTC students and two active duty USMC volunteers engaged in three separate “shoot/don’t-shoot” tasks using three separate simulated CID aids of different reliability levels (90%, 75%, and 60%). Improved target identification accuracy and reaction time were observed when the participants used more reliable CID aids. Higher trust ratings were associated with the more reliable aids. The results suggest that these types of automated aids may be useful in terms of both lethality and as a fratricide prevention tool, provided there is a high reliability associated with the system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bliss

J. P.

Chancey

(2010). The effects of alarm system reliability and reaction training strategy on alarm responses. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, (pp. 2248-2252). San Francisco, CA.

Bliss

J. P.

Dunn

Fuller

B. S.

(1995). Reversal of the cry-wolf effect: An investigation of two methods to increase alarm response rates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 1231-1242.

Boyd

C. S.

Collyer

R. S.

Skinner

D. J.

Smeaton

A. E.

Wilson

S. A.

Krause

D. W.

. (2005). Characterisation of combat identification. TENCON 2005 IEEE Region 10 . Aerosp. Concepts Pty Ltd., Fyshwick, ATC.

Dzindolet

M. T.

Pierce

L. G.

Beck

H. P.

Dawe

L. A.

Anderson

B. W.

(2001). Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military Psychology, 13 (3), 147-164.

Famewo

J. J.

Bruyn Martin

L. E.

Zobarich

R. M.

Vihena

P. G.

Lamoureux

T. M.

(2007). Combat identification: A summary of the literature, function flow analysis and decision requirements analysis. DRDC Toronto Contractor Report (CR-2007-123).

Flanagan

McAnally

K. I.

Martin

R. L.

Meehan

J. W.

Oldfield

S. R.

(1998). Aurally and visually guided visual search in a virtual environment. Human Factors, 40 (3), 461-468.

Jian

Bisantz

A. M.

Drury

C. G.

(2000). Foundations for an empiricaly determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 53-57.

Karsh

Walrath

J. D.

Swoboda

J. C.

Pillalamarri

(1995). The effects of battlefield combat identification system information on target identification time and errors in a simulated tank engagement task. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

Lee

J. D.

See

K. A.

(2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46 (1), 50-80.

10.

Wang

Jamieson

G. A.

Hollands

J. G.

(2009). Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system. Human Factors, 51 (3), 281-291.

11.

Webb

C. M.

Hewett

K. J.

(2010). An analysis of U.S. Army fratricide incidents during the Global War on Terror (11 September 2001 to 31 March 2008). United States Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory -Warfighter Performance and Health Division.

12.

Wickens

C. D.

Dixon

S. R.

(2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8 (3), 201-212.