The Design of Product Comparison Tables and its Effects on Decision Making

Abstract

Consumers are constantly presented with new information about new products. The presentation of this information can affect decision making processes by varying the form, organization, and sequence of the information (Kleinmuntz & Schkade, 1993). One organization strategy frequently used in marketing is a product comparison table which allows for side-by-side comparisons to be made. Two decision making heuristics which can occur when using such tables are the “as-if (AI) heuristic,” where all features are treated “as if” they are equal in importance or value, and the other is the “elimination-by-aspect (EBA) heuristic,” where a preferred feature must be present for an alternative to be considered further. One design manipulation that could affect such heuristics when using a table is shading. When applying the Proximity Compatibility Principle (PCP) and theories of visual search, it is easy to see how shading can influence or shape the perceptual acquisition of information and, in turn, affect decision making strategies. This research looked at shading orientation and its effects on decision making during a guided choice task. The study of spontaneous choice is ongoing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buhrmester

M. D.

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(in press). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Caroux

Le Bigot

Vibert

(2011), Maximizing players’ anticipation by appling the Perceptual Proximity Principle to design of video games. Human Factors, 53(2), 103-117.

D’Souza

(2007). Green decisions: Demographics and consumer understanding of environmental labels. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 371-376.

DelVecchio

Lakshmanan

Krishnan

H. S.

(2009). The effects of discount location and frame on consumers’ price estimates. Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 336-346.

Haarbauer

E. S.

Mahan

R. P.

Crooks

C. L.

(2001). Information displays for medical diagnosis. Proceedings of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43rd ANNUAL MEETING.

Hartmann

Ibanez

V. A.

(2006). Green value added. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(7), 673-680.

Kawanaka

(2007). Document recognition and XML generation of tabular form discharge case search system, Methods Inf Med, 46, 700-708.

Kleinmuntz

D. N.

Schkade

D. A.

(1993). Information displays and decision processes. Psychological Science, 4(4), 221-227.

Marino

C. J.

Mahan

R. P.

(2005). Configural displays can improve nutrition-related decisions: An application of the Proximity Compatibility Principle. Human Factors, 47(1), 121-130.

10.

Pechmann

Stewart

D. W.

(1990). The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 180-191.

11.

Tversky

(1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299

12.

Umananth

N. S.

Scamell

R. W.

(1988). An experimental evaluation of the impact of data display format on recall performance. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 562-570.

13.

Wickens

C. D.

Carswell

C. M.

(1995). The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37(3), 473-494.

14.

Wickens

C. D.

(2004). The role of highlighting in visual search through maps. Spatial Vision 17(4-5). 373-388.

15.

Woglater

M. S.

Paine

C. S.

Mills

B. J.

(1999). Application of cognitive principles to the design of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications. Proceedings of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43rd ANNUAL MEETING.