Effects of Cross-Training on Team Performance,Communication,and Workload in Simulated Air Battle Management

Abstract

Team cross-training is used to improve team interpositional knowledge (IPK). IPK is thought to promote adaptability, allowing teams to maintain coordination and performance when faced with challenges, such as increased task demands and role reconfiguration. The current experiment examined the effects of experiential cross-training, a form of training where teammates practice each other’s tasks and duties, in 5-person teams performing a command and control (C2) air battle management (ABM) simulation over a 5-day training period. Results indicated that under some conditions, cross-training resulted in slightly diminished team performance relative to control teams. Cross-trained teams also reported higher levels of workload throughout training. However, teams who underwent cross-training were better able to maintain team communication when faced with increased task demands.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blickensderfer

Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

(1998). Cross-training and team performance. In Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

(Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implication for individual and team training (pp. 299-311), American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.

Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

Blickensderfer

Bowers

C.A.

(1998). The impact of cross-training and workload on team functioning: a replication and extension of initial findings. Human Factors, 40, 92-101.

Grieve

A.P.

C.-G.

(1984). Tests of sphericity of normal distributions and the analysis of repeated measures designs. Psychometrika, 49, 257-267.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P. A.

Meshkati

(Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science/North Holland.

MacMillan

Paley

M.J.

Entin

E.B.

Entin

E.E.

(2005). Questionnaires for distributed assessment of team mutual awareness. In Stanton

Hedge

Brookhuis

Salas

Hendrick

(Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods (pp. 484-494). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Marks

M.A.

Sabella

M.J.

Burke

C.S.

Zaccaro

S.J.

(2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.

McCann

Baranski

J.V.

Thompson

M.M.

Pigeau

R.A.

(2000). On the utility of experiential cross-training for decision-making under time stress. Ergonomics, 43, 1095-1110.

Salas

Nichols

D.R.

Driskell

J.E.

(2007). Testing three team training strategies in intact teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 38, 471-488.

Strang

A.J.

Funke

G.J.

Russell

S.M.

Miller

B.T.

Knott

B.A.

(2011). Collaboration technologies decrease reliance on radio communication in simulated air battle management. Proceedings for the 16th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, 191-196.

10.

Strang

A.J.

Knott

B.A.

Funke

G.J.

Russell

S.M.

Miller

B.T.

Dukes

A.W.

Hyson

Courtice

A.M.

Brown

Lyons

Bolia

R.S.

(2011). Collaboration technologies improve performance and communication in air battle management. Military Psychology, 23, 390-409.

11.

Volpe

C.E.

Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

Spector

P.E.

(1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation. Human Factors, 38, 87-100.