Current military robotics research aims to transition the robot from tool to teammate, one that is more autonomous and acts with limited supervision within a highly complex and demanding environment. Investigating likely analogs to the human-robot team can provide guidance an inspiration into the simultaneous development of robot design and human training. Human-animal teams are one such metaphor that can provide insight into the capabilities of near-future robotic teammates. This paper explores the human-animal team metaphor, and describes a continuum of relevant human–animal team capabilities that can inform and guide the design of next-generation human–robot teams.
BenyusJ. M. (1997) Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York:Morrow.
4.
BryantC.D. (1979). The Zoological Connection: Animal-Related Human Behavior. Proceedings of the 1979 Southern Sociological Society, USA, 399.
5.
BurkeJ. L.MurphyR. R. (2004). Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: two heads arebetter than one. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and HumanInteractive Communication, Japan, 307-312.
6.
CarlsonJ.MurphyR. R. (2005). How UGVs physically fail in the field. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 21(3), 423-437.
DuffyB. R. (2003). Anthromorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177-190. doi:10.1016/S09218890(09)00374-3
12.
FeltovichP.BradshawJ. M.JeffersR.SuriN.UszokA. (2004). Social order and adaptability in animal and human cultures as an analogue for agent communities: Toward a policy-based approach. In Engineering Societies in the Agents World IV. LNAI 3071. (pp. 21-48). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
13.
GreenebaumJ.B. (2010). Training Dogs and Training Humans: Symbolic Interaction and Dog Training. Anthrozoös, 23 (2), 129-141.
14.
HancockP. A.BillingsD. R.SchaeferK. E.ChenJ. Y. C.de VisserE. J.ParasuramanR. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(5), 517-527. doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254
KiggunduM.N. (1981). Task interdependence and the theory of job design.The Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 499-508.
17.
KnappM.HallJ. (2010). Nonverbal communication in human interaction.Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
18.
KraigerKWenzelL.H. (1997). Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In BrannickM.T.SalasE.PrinceC. (eds.) Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 63-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
LiD.RauP.LiY. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2, 175186. doi: 10.1007/s12369-010-0056-9
MarbleJ.L.BruemmerD.J.FewD.A.DudenhoefferD.D. (2004).Evaluation of Supervisory vs. Peer-Peer Interaction with Human-Robot Teams. Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Conference on System Sciences, Vol.5, 50130b
22.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283
RouseW. B.MorrisN. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349-363. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
27.
SaavedraR.EarleyC. P.Van DyneL. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 61-72: doi 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61
28.
SingerP. W. (2009). Wired for war. New York: The Penguin Press.
29.
ThompsonJ.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
WoodsS. (2006). Exploring the design space of robots: Children’s perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 18, 1390-1418.
31.
YancoH. A.DruryJ. (2004). Classifying human-robot interaction: anupdated taxonomy. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE InternationalConference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, USA. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400763
32.
YuJ.SuZ.WangM.TanM.ZhangJ. (2012). Control of Yaw and Pitch Maneuvers of a Multilink Dolphin Robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 28(2), 318-329. doi: 10.1109/tro.2011.2171095
