Understanding patient skills, abilities, and other resources related to health literacy is crucial for improvement of self-care knowledge and behaviors. The current study explored links between cognitive abilities, knowledge, and reading engagement within the framework of process-knowledge model of health literacy (e.g., Chin et al., 2011) as measured using the S-TOFHLA (Baker et al., 1999). The data suggest that more reading engagement compensates limits of processing capacity for better health-related literacy. The results imply that patient education about the benefits of engagement in reading activities may potentially improve health literacy and comprehension of self-care information among older adults with lower processing capacity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenR. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1–10.
2.
BakerD. W. (2006). The meaning and the measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 878–883.
3.
BakerD. W.GazmararianJ. A.SudanoJ.PattersonM. (2000). The association between age and health literacy among elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology, 55, 368–374.
4.
BakerD. W.WilliamsM. V.ParkerR. M.GazmararianJ. A.NurssJ. (1999). Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 38, 33–42.
5.
BaltesP. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.
6.
BeierM. E.AckermanP. L. (2005). Age, ability and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge. Psychology and Aging, 20, 341–355.
7.
ChinJ.MorrowD. G.Stine-MorrowE. A. L.Conner-GarciaT.GraumlichJ. F.MurrayM. D. (2011). The process-knowledge model of health literacy: Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 222–241.
8.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmonH. H.DermenD. (1976). Manual for the kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9.
GazmararianJ. A.WilliamsM. V.PeelJ.BakerD. W. (2003). Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease. Patient Education and Counseling, 51, 267–275.
10.
JohnsonR. E. (2003). Aging and the remembering of text. Developmental Review, 23, 261–346.
11.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.BaerJ. (2005). A First Look at the Literacy of America’s Adults in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
13.
LevinthalB. R.MorrowD. G.TuW.WuJ.YoungJ.WeinerM.MurrayM. D. (2008). Cognition and health literacy in patients with hypertension. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 1172–1176.
14.
MillerL. M. S.Stine-MorrowE. A. L.KirkorianH. L.ConroyM. L. (2004). Adult age differences in knowledge-driven reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 811–821.
15.
MorrowD. G.LeirerV.AltieriP.FitzsimmonsC. (1994). When expertise reduces age differences in performance. Psychology and Aging, 9, 134–148.
16.
Nielsen-BohlmanL.PanzerA. M.KindigD. A. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion (Institute of Medicine Report). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
17.
Paasche-OrlowM. K.ParkerR.M.GazmararianJ.A.Nielsen-BohlmanL.T.RuddR.R. (2005). The prevalence of limited health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 1–10.
18.
PayneB. R.GaoX.NohS. R.AndersonC. J.Stine-MorrowE. A. L. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 122–149.
19.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.
20.
SalthouseT. A. (1991). Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychological Science, 2, 179–183.
21.
SalthouseT. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140–144
22.
SmithK. W.SasakiM. S. (1979). Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociological Methods Research, 8, 35–56.
23.
StanovichK. E.CunninghamA. E.WestR. F. (1998). Literacy experiences and the shaping of cognition. In ParisS. G.WellmanH. M. (Eds.), Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling, (pp. 253–288), Washington, D. C., American Psychological Association Press.
24.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F.HarrisonM. (1995). Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span: The role of print exposure. Developmental Psychology, 31, 811–826.
25.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. Understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
WechslerD. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence test manual (3rd ed.). Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
27.
WisterA. V.Malloy-WeirL. J.RootmanI.DesjardinsR. (2010). Lifelong educational practices and resources in enabling health literacy among older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 22, 827–854.
